Ad is loading...
CELTF
Price
$1.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
KGC
Price
$9.25
Change
-$0.14 (-1.49%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
86 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CELTF vs KGC

Header iconCELTF vs KGC Comparison
Open Charts CELTF vs KGCBanner chart's image
Centamin
Price$1.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.9K
CapitalizationN/A
Kinross Gold
Price$9.25
Change-$0.14 (-1.49%)
Volume$15.12M
CapitalizationN/A
CELTF vs KGC Comparison Chart
Loading...
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELTF vs. KGC commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELTF is a Hold and KGC is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CELTF: $1.85 vs. KGC: $9.25)
Brand notoriety: CELTF: Not notable vs. KGC: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELTF: 36% vs. KGC: 91%
Market capitalization -- CELTF: $1.43B vs. KGC: $7.52B
CELTF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.43B. KGC’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELTF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKGC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CELTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KGC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CELTF is a better buy in the long-term than KGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CELTF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.82% price change this week, while KGC (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

KGC is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGC($7.52B) has a higher market cap than CELTF($1.44B). CELTF (18.80) and KGC (18.12) have similar P/E ratio . KGC YTD gains are higher at: 54.831 vs. CELTF (50.433). KGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. CELTF (362M). KGC has more cash in the bank: 352M vs. CELTF (96.2M). CELTF has less debt than KGC: CELTF (4.01M) vs KGC (2.26B). KGC has higher revenues than CELTF: KGC (4.24B) vs CELTF (832M).
CELTFKGCCELTF / KGC
Capitalization1.44B7.52B19%
EBITDA362M1.76B21%
Gain YTD50.43354.83192%
P/E Ratio18.8018.12104%
Revenue832M4.24B20%
Total Cash96.2M352M27%
Total Debt4.01M2.26B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELTF vs KGC: Fundamental Ratings
CELTF
KGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5941
SMR RATING
1..100
7774
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3293
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CELTF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as KGC (15) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CELTF’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CELTF (59) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to CELTF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's SMR Rating (74) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CELTF (77) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to CELTF’s over the last 12 months.

CELTF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as KGC (46) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CELTF’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

CELTF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KGC (93) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CELTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FITIX23.83-0.26
-1.08%
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II M
TSGUX18.70-0.24
-1.27%
Morgan Stanley Pathway Sm-Mid Cap Eq
ITHTX59.34-0.82
-1.36%
Hartford Capital Appreciation R5
JTKCX13.71-0.23
-1.65%
JHancock Global Thematic Opps C
JMIGX24.86-0.51
-2.01%
Jacob Discovery Fd Instl

CELTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CELTF and KGC have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELTF and KGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELTF
1D Price
Change %
CELTF100%
N/A
KGC - CELTF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
NGD - CELTF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
PAFRF - CELTF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLRMF - CELTF
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.53%
WPM - CELTF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
More

KGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGC has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KGC jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGC
1D Price
Change %
KGC100%
-1.49%
AEM - KGC
85%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
AGI - KGC
80%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
GOLD - KGC
78%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
WPM - KGC
77%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
PAAS - KGC
77%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
More