Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMFX vs FNWFX
CEMFX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMFX vs FNWFX
CEMFX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMFX vs. FNWFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMFX is a Hold and FNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. CEMFX (2.39B). CEMFX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: CEMFX (2.09) vs FNWFX (1.27). CEMFX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: CEMFX (14 years) vs FNWFX (10 years). CEMFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). CEMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). CEMFX (1000000) and FNWFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CEMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.16 vs. FNWFX (22.64). CEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 101.00 vs. FNWFX (23.97).
| CEMFX | FNWFX | CEMFX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.57 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.57 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.336 | 17.140 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 88.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 1.27 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.16 | 22.64 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.46 | 56.80 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.00 | 23.97 | 421% |
| Returns for 10 years | 181.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers