Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMFX vs FNWFX
CEMFX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMFX vs FNWFX
CEMFX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMFX vs. FNWFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMFX is a Hold and FNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. CEMFX (2.23B). CEMFX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: CEMFX (2.08) vs FNWFX (1.24). CEMFX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: CEMFX (14 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). CEMFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). CEMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). CEMFX (1000000) and FNWFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CEMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.50 vs. FNWFX (19.73). CEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 87.57 vs. FNWFX (14.94).
| CEMFX | FNWFX | CEMFX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.57 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.57 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.223 | 12.743 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 90.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 1.24 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.50 | 19.73 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.07 | 44.48 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.57 | 14.94 | 586% |
| Returns for 10 years | 183.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement