AA
Price
$45.26
Change
+$0.29 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
11.94B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CENX
Price
$44.77
Change
-$0.11 (-0.25%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.43B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AA vs CENX

AA vs CENX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AA vs. CENX commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AA is a StrongBuy and CENX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (AA: $45.26 vs. CENX: $44.77)
Brand notoriety: AA: Notable vs. CENX: Not notable
Both companies represent the Aluminum industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AA: 90% vs. CENX: 65%
Market capitalization -- AA: $11.94B vs. CENX: $4.43B
AA [@Aluminum] is valued at $11.94B. CENX’s [@Aluminum] market capitalization is $4.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aluminum] industry ranges from $54.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aluminum] industry is $5.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCENX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CENX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CENX is a better buy in the long-term than AA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CENX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CENX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AA is a better buy in the short-term than CENX.

Price Growth

AA (@Aluminum) experienced а +2.31% price change this week, while CENX (@Aluminum) price change was -3.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aluminum industry was -1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

AA is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

CENX is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aluminum (-1.77% weekly)

Aluminum is widely used in the industries like construction, packaging and automotive sector. The segment has seen increased demand for the lightweight variety in automobiles in improving fuel efficiency. The U.S. aluminum industry generates nearly $71 billion a year in direct economic impact (according to The Aluminum Association). Arconic, Inc, Alcoa Corp and Kaiser Aluminum Corporation are major aluminum companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AA($11.9B) has a higher market cap than CENX($4.43B). CENX has higher P/E ratio than AA: CENX (13.32) vs AA (9.41). CENX YTD gains are higher at: 14.267 vs. AA (-14.553). AA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.99B vs. CENX (444M). AA has more cash in the bank: 1.35B vs. CENX (244M). CENX has less debt than AA: CENX (546M) vs AA (2.23B). AA has higher revenues than CENX: AA (13.6B) vs CENX (2.54B).
AACENXAA / CENX
Capitalization11.9B4.43B269%
EBITDA1.99B444M449%
Gain YTD-14.55314.267-102%
P/E Ratio9.4113.3271%
Revenue13.6B2.54B535%
Total Cash1.35B244M554%
Total Debt2.23B546M408%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AA vs CENX: Fundamental Ratings
AA
CENX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6769
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9042
SMR RATING
1..100
4827
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9577
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AA's Valuation (22) in the Aluminum industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CENX (81). This means that AA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CENX’s over the last 12 months.

CENX's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Aluminum industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AA (90). This means that CENX’s stock grew somewhat faster than AA’s over the last 12 months.

CENX's SMR Rating (27) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as AA (48). This means that CENX’s stock grew similarly to AA’s over the last 12 months.

CENX's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as AA (60). This means that CENX’s stock grew similarly to AA’s over the last 12 months.

CENX's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as AA (95). This means that CENX’s stock grew similarly to AA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AACENX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CENX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JZXN1.450.12
+9.02%
Jiuzi Holdings Inc.
DBD73.592.33
+3.27%
Diebold Nixdorf
VREX11.190.12
+1.08%
Varex Imaging Corp
CHKP127.13-1.10
-0.86%
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd
OSTX1.52-0.04
-2.56%
OS Therapies Inc

AA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AA and CENX have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AA and CENX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AA
1D Price
Change %
AA100%
+0.64%
CENX - AA
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
CSTM - AA
17%
Poorly correlated
-2.77%
KALU - AA
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%

CENX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CENX has been loosely correlated with KALU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CENX jumps, then KALU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CENX
1D Price
Change %
CENX100%
-0.25%
KALU - CENX
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
CSTM - CENX
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.77%
AA - CENX
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%