CFFI
Price
$66.14
Change
+$1.19 (+1.83%)
Updated
Jul 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
163.61M
PFS
Price
$18.64
Change
+$0.31 (+1.69%)
Updated
Jul 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.1B
7 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFFI vs PFS

Header iconCFFI vs PFS Comparison
Open Charts CFFI vs PFSBanner chart's image
C&F Financial
Price$66.14
Change+$1.19 (+1.83%)
Volume$100
Capitalization163.61M
Provident Financial Services
Price$18.64
Change+$0.31 (+1.69%)
Volume$12.97K
Capitalization1.1B
CFFI vs PFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFFI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFFI vs. PFS commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFI is a Buy and PFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CFFI: $66.16 vs. PFS: $18.62)
Brand notoriety: CFFI and PFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFI: 85% vs. PFS: 126%
Market capitalization -- CFFI: $163.61M vs. PFS: $1.1B
CFFI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $163.61M. PFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than CFFI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the short-term than CFFI.

Price Growth

CFFI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.84% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFFI is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

PFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($1.1B) has a higher market cap than CFFI($164M). PFS has higher P/E ratio than CFFI: PFS (8.49) vs CFFI (7.08). PFS YTD gains are higher at: 1.304 vs. CFFI (-5.876). PFS has more cash in the bank: 189M vs. CFFI (16.4M). CFFI has less debt than PFS: CFFI (110M) vs PFS (1.46B). PFS has higher revenues than CFFI: PFS (479M) vs CFFI (126M).
CFFIPFSCFFI / PFS
Capitalization164M1.1B15%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.8761.304-451%
P/E Ratio7.088.4983%
Revenue126M479M26%
Total Cash16.4M189M9%
Total Debt110M1.46B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFFI vs PFS: Fundamental Ratings
CFFI
PFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
213
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3947
SMR RATING
1..100
3412
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3015
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFFI's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (38) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CFFI’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

CFFI's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CFFI’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (12) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFI (34) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to CFFI’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFI (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to CFFI’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFI (30) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to CFFI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFIPFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFFI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTSFY27.510.28
+1.03%
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
BRLAF5.19N/A
N/A
British Land Company (The) PLC
CESTY3.35N/A
N/A
Chinese Estates Holdings Ltd.
HSTI1.35N/A
N/A
High Sierra Technologies Inc.
QQQFF0.02N/A
N/A
Quizam Media Corporation