CFFI
Price
$77.85
Change
-$2.21 (-2.76%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
256.12M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PFS
Price
$23.51
Change
-$0.02 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFFI vs PFS

CFFI vs PFS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFFI vs. PFS commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFI is a StrongBuy and PFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CFFI: $77.85 vs. PFS: $23.51)
Brand notoriety: CFFI and PFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFI: 32% vs. PFS: 75%
Market capitalization -- CFFI: $256.12M vs. PFS: $3.06B
CFFI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $256.12M. PFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFFI is a better buy in the long-term than PFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFFI is a better buy in the short-term than PFS.

Price Growth

CFFI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.64% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($3.06B) has a higher market cap than CFFI($256M). PFS has higher P/E ratio than CFFI: PFS (10.00) vs CFFI (9.04). PFS YTD gains are higher at: 21.620 vs. CFFI (8.648). PFS has more cash in the bank: 211M vs. CFFI (15.3M). CFFI has less debt than PFS: CFFI (103M) vs PFS (2.8B). PFS has higher revenues than CFFI: PFS (887M) vs CFFI (140M).
CFFIPFSCFFI / PFS
Capitalization256M3.06B8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.64821.62040%
P/E Ratio9.0410.0090%
Revenue140M887M16%
Total Cash15.3M211M7%
Total Debt103M2.8B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFFI vs PFS: Fundamental Ratings
CFFI
PFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9382
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4772
SMR RATING
1..100
6031
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5989
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (17) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFI (21) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to CFFI’s over the last 12 months.

CFFI's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (72) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CFFI’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (31) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFI (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to CFFI’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFI (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to CFFI’s over the last 12 months.

CFFI's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (89) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CFFI’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFIPFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFFI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GVEZX19.68N/A
N/A
GuideStone Funds Value Equity Investor
EKBCX19.89N/A
N/A
Allspring Diversified Cap Bldr C
IJSTX16.19N/A
N/A
VY® JPMorgan Small Cap Core Equity S2
THISX90.85N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences I
HVEIX29.76N/A
N/A
HVIA Equity Institutional

CFFI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFI has been loosely correlated with FBIZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFFI jumps, then FBIZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFFI
1D Price
Change %
CFFI100%
-2.76%
FBIZ - CFFI
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FIBK - CFFI
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
BUSE - CFFI
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
PFS - CFFI
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
FMBH - CFFI
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
More