CFG
Price
$44.88
Change
-$1.30 (-2.82%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
16.64B
53 days until earnings call
HWC
Price
$56.82
Change
-$1.30 (-2.24%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
4B
59 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CFG vs HWC

Header iconCFG vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs HWCBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$44.88
Change-$1.30 (-2.82%)
Volume$2.87M
Capitalization16.64B
Hancock Whitney
Price$56.82
Change-$1.30 (-2.24%)
Volume$561.77K
Capitalization4B
CFG vs HWC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. HWC commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a Hold and HWC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (CFG: $46.18 vs. HWC: $58.12)
Brand notoriety: CFG and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 105% vs. HWC: 82%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $16.64B vs. HWC: $4B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $16.64B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the long-term than HWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the short-term than CFG.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.28% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.95% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFG($16.6B) has a higher market cap than HWC($4B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than HWC: CFG (11.39) vs HWC (9.98). CFG (6.455) and HWC (6.213) have similar YTD gains . CFG has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. HWC (561M). HWC has less debt than CFG: HWC (1.52B) vs CFG (14B). CFG has higher revenues than HWC: CFG (8.22B) vs HWC (1.37B).
CFGHWCCFG / HWC
Capitalization16.6B4B415%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.4556.213104%
P/E Ratio11.399.98114%
Revenue8.22B1.37B602%
Total Cash11.6B561M2,068%
Total Debt14B1.52B923%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7158
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5033
SMR RATING
1..100
611
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1640
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFG's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (64). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (50). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (11). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (47). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (40). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HWMAX55.35N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value A
VTSNX134.98N/A
N/A
Vanguard Total Intl Stock Index I
TTISX10.86N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Intl Sm Cap Eq Retirement
AMAJX11.04N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Dividend R
APHJX18.28-0.08
-0.44%
Artisan International Small-Mid Instl

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
-1.21%
ASB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
FNB - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
UBSI - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
ABCB - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
UCB - HWC
89%
Closely correlated
-2.02%
More