CFG
Price
$48.31
Change
+$0.77 (+1.62%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
16.64B
84 days until earnings call
HWC
Price
$60.61
Change
+$1.51 (+2.55%)
Updated
Jan 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4B
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

CFG vs HWC

Header iconCFG vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs HWCBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$48.31
Change+$0.77 (+1.62%)
Volume$4.3M
Capitalization16.64B
Hancock Whitney
Price$60.61
Change+$1.51 (+2.55%)
Volume$13.89K
Capitalization4B
CFG vs HWC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. HWC commentary
Jan 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a Hold and HWC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 22, 2025
Stock price -- (CFG: $48.31 vs. HWC: $59.10)
Brand notoriety: CFG and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 105% vs. HWC: 183%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $16.64B vs. HWC: $4B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $16.64B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the long-term than HWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CFG and HWC are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.71% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.29% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFG($16.6B) has a higher market cap than HWC($4B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than HWC: CFG (11.39) vs HWC (9.98). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 10.398 vs. HWC (8.004). CFG has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. HWC (561M). HWC has less debt than CFG: HWC (1.52B) vs CFG (14B). CFG has higher revenues than HWC: CFG (8.22B) vs HWC (1.37B).
CFGHWCCFG / HWC
Capitalization16.6B4B415%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.3988.004130%
P/E Ratio11.399.98114%
Revenue8.22B1.37B602%
Total Cash11.6B561M2,068%
Total Debt14B1.52B923%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5037
SMR RATING
1..100
611
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1623
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFG's Valuation (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (69). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (50). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (11). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (41). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (23). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VFFSX293.542.91
+1.00%
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
ACGMX22.190.16
+0.73%
Invesco Growth and Income Y
IAXAX8.950.06
+0.67%
VY® T. Rowe Price Divers Mid Cap Gr A
RMBJX25.260.14
+0.56%
RMB C
MOSNX8.060.04
+0.50%
MassMutual Overseas R3

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with ZION. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then ZION could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
+1.62%
ZION - CFG
88%
Closely correlated
+1.71%
RF - CFG
87%
Closely correlated
+1.86%
FITB - CFG
86%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
HWC - CFG
86%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
PNC - CFG
84%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
More

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
+1.09%
ASB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
FNB - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
CADE - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
ABCB - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
UBSI - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
More