CFG
Price
$43.44
Change
+$0.99 (+2.33%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
26 days until earnings call
HWC
Price
$54.37
Change
+$1.12 (+2.10%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CFG vs HWC

Header iconCFG vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs HWCBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$43.44
Change+$0.99 (+2.33%)
Volume$34.1K
CapitalizationN/A
Hancock Whitney
Price$54.37
Change+$1.12 (+2.10%)
Volume$21.08K
CapitalizationN/A
CFG vs HWC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. HWC commentary
Dec 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a Hold and HWC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 22, 2024
Stock price -- (CFG: $43.45 vs. HWC: $54.38)
Brand notoriety: CFG and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 288% vs. HWC: 361%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $16.64B vs. HWC: $4B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $16.64B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CFG and HWC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.92% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2025.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFG($16.6B) has a higher market cap than HWC($4B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than HWC: CFG (11.39) vs HWC (9.98). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 37.032 vs. HWC (15.352). CFG has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. HWC (561M). HWC has less debt than CFG: HWC (1.52B) vs CFG (14B). CFG has higher revenues than HWC: CFG (8.22B) vs HWC (1.37B).
CFGHWCCFG / HWC
Capitalization16.6B4B415%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD37.03215.352241%
P/E Ratio11.399.98114%
Revenue8.22B1.37B602%
Total Cash11.6B561M2,068%
Total Debt14B1.52B923%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7287
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5641
SMR RATING
1..100
610
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1328
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFG's Valuation (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (62). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (56). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (10). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (47). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (28). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AENT6.680.42
+6.71%
Alliance Entertainment Holding Corp
FIHL17.950.18
+1.01%
Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited
BIO327.471.53
+0.47%
Bio-Rad Laboratories IncClass A
ARTL0.95N/A
+0.17%
Artelo Biosciences
UFCS28.95-0.54
-1.83%
United Fire Group

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with ZION. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then ZION could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
+2.36%
ZION - CFG
88%
Closely correlated
+2.50%
RF - CFG
88%
Closely correlated
+2.59%
FITB - CFG
87%
Closely correlated
+1.59%
HWC - CFG
85%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
KEY - CFG
85%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
More

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
+2.12%
ASB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
CADE - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
FNB - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
UBSI - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
ABCB - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
More