CFG
Price
$71.88
Change
+$0.08 (+0.11%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
30.38B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FNB
Price
$19.05
Change
+$0.18 (+0.95%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
6.78B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs FNB

CFG vs FNB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. FNB commentary
Jul 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a Hold and FNB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (CFG: $71.88 vs. FNB: $19.05)
Brand notoriety: CFG and FNB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 60% vs. FNB: 170%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $30.38B vs. FNB: $6.78B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $30.38B. FNB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CFG and FNB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FNB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the short-term than CFG.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while FNB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.

FNB is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFG($30.4B) has a higher market cap than FNB($6.78B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than FNB: CFG (15.66) vs FNB (11.34). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 24.817 vs. FNB (13.037). CFG has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. FNB (452M). FNB has less debt than CFG: FNB (3.14B) vs CFG (12.3B). CFG has higher revenues than FNB: CFG (8.48B) vs FNB (1.8B).
CFGFNBCFG / FNB
Capitalization30.4B6.78B448%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.81713.037190%
P/E Ratio15.6611.34138%
Revenue8.48B1.8B470%
Total Cash12.7B452M2,810%
Total Debt12.3B3.14B392%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs FNB: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
FNB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2331
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4032
SMR RATING
1..100
921
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4356
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNB's Valuation (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (56). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (40). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (21). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (46). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (56). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGFNB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FNB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRX.X0.3305110.001906
+0.58%
TRON cryptocurrency
RARE.X0.0124250.000020
+0.16%
SuperRare cryptocurrency
USTC.X0.005200-0.000060
-1.13%
TerraClassicUSD cryptocurrency
NEO.X1.980052-0.075705
-3.68%
Neo cryptocurrency
PDA.X0.000845-0.000043
-4.82%
PlayDapp cryptocurrency

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with KEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then KEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
+0.11%
KEY - CFG
90%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
RF - CFG
88%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
ZION - CFG
87%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
FITB - CFG
87%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
FNB - CFG
86%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
More