Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFJAX vs RMEBX
CFJAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CFJAX vs RMEBX
CFJAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFJAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFJAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CFJAX (2.13B). CFJAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CFJAX (1.53) vs RMEBX (1.00). CFJAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CFJAX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CFJAX (0.62). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CFJAX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFJAX: RMEBX (250) vs CFJAX (5000). CFJAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.40 vs. RMEBX (7.56). CFJAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.95 vs. RMEBX (36.13).
| CFJAX | RMEBX | CFJAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.07 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.07 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.370 | 9.246 | 231% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.00 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.40 | 7.56 | 283% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.11 | 31.88 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.95 | 36.13 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.94 | 89.32 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement