Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFJAX vs RMFCX
CFJAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CFJAX vs RMFCX
CFJAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFJAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFJAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CFJAX (2.13B). CFJAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CFJAX (1.53) vs RMFCX (1.16). CFJAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CFJAX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CFJAX (0.62). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CFJAX (27.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFJAX: RMFCX (250) vs CFJAX (5000). CFJAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.40 vs. RMFCX (7.69). CFJAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.95 vs. RMFCX (37.08).
| CFJAX | RMFCX | CFJAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.91 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.370 | 9.325 | 229% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.16 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.40 | 7.69 | 278% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.11 | 32.42 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.95 | 37.08 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.94 | 91.03 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement