Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSMX vs MVCAX
CFSMX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts CFSMX vs MVCAX
Clarkston Partners Founders
Price$13.72
Change+$0.13 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets962.31M
CFSMX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSMX vs. MVCAX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSMX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.2B vs. CFSMX (962M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than CFSMX: MVCAX (0.87) vs CFSMX (0.55). CFSMX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: CFSMX (10 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). MVCAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than CFSMX (0.88). MVCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CFSMX (22.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSMX: MVCAX (1000) vs CFSMX (100000000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.70 vs. CFSMX (-1.90). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.59 vs. CFSMX (12.65).
| CFSMX | MVCAX | CFSMX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.99 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.00 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.405 | 3.814 | -168% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000 | 10,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 962M | 17.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.87 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.90 | -1.70 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.82 | 16.54 | -84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.65 | 54.59 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement