Investors evaluating the financial services sector frequently encounter IVZ and STT — two storied names with overlapping capabilities but distinct business models. Invesco, headquartered in Atlanta, is one of the world's largest independent asset managers, while Boston-based State Street is a systemically important custody bank that also runs a substantial investment management division. This stock comparison examines how these two companies stack up against each other in terms of recent performance, growth drivers, risk exposure, and market positioning, offering a data-driven framework for traders and long-term investors alike.
IVZ (Invesco) is a global asset management firm overseeing $2.17 trillion in AUM as of its most recent quarterly filing — a record level representing a 17.5% year-over-year increase. The company serves clients across more than 120 countries through a diverse product lineup spanning active, passive, and alternative strategies. In recent months, Invesco delivered adjusted diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $0.62, exceeding consensus estimates and reflecting a 19.2% improvement versus the same period a year earlier. The adjusted operating margin expanded to 36.4%, driven by positive operating leverage and disciplined expense management.
Several developments have shaped sentiment around IVZ. The conversion of the Invesco QQQ Trust from a Unit Investment Trust (UIT) to an open-end ETF (exchange-traded fund) marked a structural shift that enables the firm to earn management fees directly on one of the world's most widely traded ETFs. Meanwhile, the company completed the sale of its Intelliflo business and a majority stake in its India asset management unit, streamlining operations. Net long-term inflows were $19.1 billion in the most recent quarter, powered by ETFs and Index strategies and the China joint venture, though fundamental equities continued to experience net outflows — a headwind that has persisted across the active management industry.
STT (State Street Corporation) occupies a distinctive position in the financial ecosystem. It is the world's largest custody bank by AUC/A — which stands for assets under custody and administration — reaching a record $53.8 trillion in its latest quarterly report, up 15.6% year over year. At the same time, its investment management arm, State Street Global Advisors, manages $5.67 trillion in AUM, making it one of the largest asset managers globally. The firm's flagship SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) remains the largest ETF in the world by assets.
State Street's recent financial results reflected broad-based strength. Total quarterly revenue hit a record $3.67 billion, rising 7.5% year over year, while full-year revenue surpassed $14 billion. Adjusted EPS came in at $2.97 for the quarter and $10.30 for the full year, both exceeding analyst expectations. Net interest income (NII) rose 7.1%, supported by a net interest margin (NIM) of 1.10%. State Street's Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio — a key measure of a bank's financial strength — stood at 11.7%, well above regulatory minimums. The firm returned over $2.1 billion to shareholders through repurchases and dividends during the full year. However, software and processing fees declined as the company navigates a transition from on-premises software renewals to a software-as-a-service (SaaS) delivery model, a shift that management views as strategically necessary but which creates near-term revenue headwinds.
Navigating the expanding universe of AI-driven trading tools can be challenging, but Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page simplifies the search by curating only the most relevant and high-performing bots for current market conditions. With hundreds of AI trading bots available — each executing distinct strategies across thousands of tickers, timeframes, and trading styles — the platform highlights those that have demonstrated the strongest alignment with prevailing trends. Users can explore bots with varied performance statistics, from those generating consistent incremental returns to those capturing momentum-driven gains, with some bots achieving win rates above 70% and annualized returns in the double digits. Whether you are looking for short-term swing trading signals or longer-duration positioning, the curated selection on the Trending AI Robots page offers a practical starting point for integrating algorithmic intelligence into your market analysis.
Although both IVZ and STT generate revenue from asset management, their business models diverge substantially. Invesco derives nearly all of its revenue from investment management fees, making it highly sensitive to AUM levels, market performance, and flow trends. State Street, in contrast, earns the majority of its revenue from servicing fees — custody, fund accounting, and administration — which are more recurring and less correlated with short-term market swings. This structural difference gives STT a more stable revenue profile but also exposes it to banking-sector regulatory dynamics that do not affect IVZ.
In terms of growth drivers, Invesco's catalyst set includes the QQQ conversion, expansion of its ETF and index franchise, and the scaling of its China joint venture. State Street's growth narrative revolves around its Alpha front-to-back office platform, digital asset infrastructure, private markets servicing, and ongoing productivity savings (which reached $500 million in the most recent year). On the risk side, IVZ carries a large goodwill and intangible asset balance — $14.2 billion, representing roughly half of total assets — creating potential impairment exposure. STT faces execution risk around its technology transformation programs and the possibility that its SaaS transition may weigh on software fees longer than anticipated.
Market sentiment toward both stocks has diverged in recent weeks. IVZ has benefited from an upward earnings revision cycle and its discounted valuation relative to peers, trading at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio below the industry average. STT, despite posting consecutive quarters of positive operating leverage and record asset levels, has seen its stock pressured by concerns about the pace of organic revenue growth and the near-term cost of strategic investments.
Based on observable trend consistency, relative valuation, and the strength of near-term catalysts, Tickeron's AI analysis would likely tilt in favor of IVZ for momentum-oriented positioning, given the structural tailwind from its QQQ conversion, improving operating margins, and above-industry organic growth in ETF and index products. For investors prioritizing stability and diversified revenue streams, STT presents a more balanced risk profile, underpinned by its dominant custody franchise, fortress-like balance sheet, and consistent capital return program. The AI verdict is probabilistic, reflecting the reality that each stock may outperform under different market regimes — IVZ when risk appetite and equity markets are rising, and STT when institutional flows and interest rate dynamics favor its banking-oriented model.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IVZ’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSTT’s FA Score has 5 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IVZ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
IVZ (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.65% price change this week, while STT (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.26%.
IVZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
STT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| IVZ | STT | IVZ / STT | |
| Capitalization | 13.2B | 50.6B | 26% |
| EBITDA | 1.5B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.246 | 45.404 | 34% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.48 | 16.26 | 120% |
| Revenue | 6.59B | 14.5B | 45% |
| Total Cash | 1.71B | 6.52B | 26% |
| Total Debt | 9.44B | 29.2B | 32% |
IVZ | STT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 5 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IVZ's Valuation (12) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as STT (15) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IVZ’s stock grew similarly to STT’s over the last 12 months.
STT's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVZ (61) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVZ’s over the last 12 months.
STT's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for IVZ (95) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew significantly faster than IVZ’s over the last 12 months.
STT's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IVZ (14) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.
STT's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IVZ (29) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.
| IVZ | STT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 65% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVZ has been loosely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IVZ jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.