Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MCFGX
CGFAX vs MCFGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MCFGX
CGFAX vs MCFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MCFGX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and MCFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MCFGX (3.91B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MCFGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs MCFGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MCFGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs MCFGX (28 years). MCFGX (1.80) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MCFGX (29.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCFGX: CGFAX (250) vs MCFGX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.15 vs. MCFGX (-20.01). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.67 vs. MCFGX (-45.11).
| CGFAX | MCFGX | CGFAX / MCFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.67 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.80 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.279 | 11.016 | 84% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 3.91B | 9,223% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.15 | -20.01 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.18 | -12.48 | -370% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.67 | -45.11 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.71 | -16.80 | -701% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers