Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MRFGX
CGFAX vs MRFGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MRFGX
CGFAX vs MRFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MRFGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and MRFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MRFGX (3.91B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MRFGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs MRFGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MRFGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs MRFGX (16 years). MRFGX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MRFGX (29.00). MRFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: MRFGX (100) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. MRFGX (-7.06). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. MRFGX (-27.21).
| CGFAX | MRFGX | CGFAX / MRFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.17 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 11.310 | 77% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 3.91B | 9,223% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | -7.06 | -169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 10.99 | 438% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | -27.21 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 25.16 | 487% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement