Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MRFGX
CGFAX vs MRFGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MRFGX
CGFAX vs MRFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MRFGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and MRFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MRFGX (3.73B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MRFGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs MRFGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MRFGX: CGFAX (25 years) vs MRFGX (16 years). MRFGX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). MRFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). MRFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: MRFGX (100) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.03 vs. MRFGX (-36.41). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.11 vs. MRFGX (-49.00).
| CGFAX | MRFGX | CGFAX / MRFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.17 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.063 | -25.133 | -36% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 3.73B | 9,456% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.03 | -36.41 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.54 | -26.06 | -163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.11 | -49.00 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.83 | -21.49 | -516% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement