Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PFGRX
CGFAX vs PFGRX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PFGRX
CGFAX vs PFGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PFGRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and PFGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. PFGRX (6.33B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than PFGRX: CGFAX (0.23) vs PFGRX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PFGRX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PFGRX (14 years). PFGRX (1.41) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PFGRX (26.00). PFGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: PFGRX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.20 vs. PFGRX (-8.74). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.81 vs. PFGRX (-7.88).
| CGFAX | PFGRX | CGFAX / PFGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.39 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.41 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.149 | 4.653 | 154% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 6.33B | 5,640% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.20 | -8.74 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | 14.90 | 261% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.81 | -7.88 | -201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.94 | 68.04 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement