Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PFGRX
CGFAX vs PFGRX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PFGRX
CGFAX vs PFGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PFGRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and PFGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. PFGRX (6.05B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than PFGRX: CGFAX (0.23) vs PFGRX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PFGRX: CGFAX (25 years) vs PFGRX (14 years). PFGRX (1.38) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PFGRX (24.00). PFGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: PFGRX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.03 vs. PFGRX (-12.09). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.11 vs. PFGRX (-9.02).
| CGFAX | PFGRX | CGFAX / PFGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.38 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.38 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.063 | 4.393 | 206% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 6.05B | 5,833% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.03 | -12.09 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.54 | 12.60 | 338% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.11 | -9.02 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.83 | 68.77 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement