Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TRIRX
CGFAX vs TRIRX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TRIRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.71
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx Retire
Price$78.33
Change+$0.59 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.64B
CGFAX vs TRIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TRIRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and TRIRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. TRIRX (17.6B). CGFAX (0.30) and TRIRX (0.30) have matching dividends . CGFAX was incepted earlier than TRIRX: CGFAX (24 years) vs TRIRX (23 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than TRIRX (0.30). TRIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). TRIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: TRIRX (0) vs CGFAX (250). TRIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.52 vs. CGFAX (6.84). TRIRX return over 5 years is better than : 67.95 vs. CGFAX (34.52).
| CGFAX | TRIRX | CGFAX / TRIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.30 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.30 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.787 | 15.000 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 17.6B | 1,858% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.30 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.84 | 14.52 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.98 | 81.20 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.52 | 67.95 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.75 | 255.30 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers