Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGLGX vs PUDAAGP
CGLGX vs PUDAAGP Comparison
Open Charts CGLGX vs PUDAAGP
CGLGX vs PUDAAGP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGLGX vs. PUDAAGP commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGLGX is a Hold and PUDAAGP is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGLGX has more cash in the bank: 23.8B vs. PUDAAGP (4.16B). CGLGX (1.83) and PUDAAGP (1.79) have matching dividends . CGLGX was incepted earlier than PUDAAGP: CGLGX (6 years) vs PUDAAGP (10 years). PUDAAGP (0.63) is less costly to investors than CGLGX (0.41). PUDAAGP is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. CGLGX (2.00). PUDAAGP has a lower initial minimum investment than CGLGX: PUDAAGP (0) vs CGLGX (250). PUDAAGP annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. CGLGX (6.89). CGLGX return over 5 years is better than : 31.84 vs. PUDAAGP (22.40).
| CGLGX | PUDAAGP | CGLGX / PUDAAGP | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.63 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.63 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.503 | 10.898 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8B | 4.16B | 572% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.79 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.89 | 9.13 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.73 | 46.37 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.84 | 22.40 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement