CGMS | CRDT | CGMS / CRDT | |
Gain YTD | -0.303 | 2.196 | -14% |
Net Assets | 2.5B | 104M | 2,401% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.48 | 26% |
Turnover | 43.00 | 322.00 | 13% |
Yield | 5.81 | 7.06 | 82% |
Fund Existence | 3 years | 2 years | - |
CGMS | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago34% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago25% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago38% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago21% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMS and DBD have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMS and DBD's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CGMS | 100% | +0.41% | ||
DBD - CGMS | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
NFE - CGMS | 20% Poorly correlated | +6.75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRDT has been loosely correlated with TWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRDT jumps, then TWO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRDT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CRDT | 100% | +0.06% | ||
TWO - CRDT | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
PMT - CRDT | 41% Loosely correlated | -6.96% | ||
CIM - CRDT | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
QVCGP - CRDT | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.39% | ||
AGNCN - CRDT | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
More |