Advertisement
CGNT vs TLS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGNT is a Hold and TLS is a Hold.
| CGNT | TLS | CGNT / TLS | |
| Capitalization | 637M | 312M | 204% |
| EBITDA | 25M | -2.52M | -992% |
| Gain YTD | -10.532 | -20.196 | 52% |
| P/E Ratio | 263.16 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 422M | 194M | 218% |
| Total Cash | 102M | 50.6M | 202% |
| Total Debt | 35.2M | 6.97M | 505% |
CGNT | TLS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 71 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TLS's Valuation (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CGNT (87) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that TLS’s stock grew significantly faster than CGNT’s over the last 12 months.
TLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CGNT (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that TLS’s stock grew similarly to CGNT’s over the last 12 months.
CGNT's SMR Rating (90) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as TLS (94) in the null industry. This means that CGNT’s stock grew similarly to TLS’s over the last 12 months.
CGNT's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as TLS (71) in the null industry. This means that CGNT’s stock grew similarly to TLS’s over the last 12 months.
CGNT's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as TLS (100) in the null industry. This means that CGNT’s stock grew similarly to TLS’s over the last 12 months.
| CGNT | TLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 23 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 89% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CGNT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while TLS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CGNT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CGNT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CGNT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- TLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CGNT (@Computer Communications) experienced а +4.86% price change this week, while TLS (@Computer Communications) price change was +3.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +6.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
CGNT is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2026.
TLS is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+6.70% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
Advertisement
CGNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGNT has been loosely correlated with AVPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGNT jumps, then AVPT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGNT | 100% | -2.44% | ||
| AVPT - CGNT | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.44% | ||
| OKTA - CGNT | 52% Loosely correlated | -4.03% | ||
| TENB - CGNT | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| CRWD - CGNT | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.28% | ||
| SAIL - CGNT | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
More | ||||
TLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLS has been loosely correlated with IMXI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLS jumps, then IMXI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLS | 100% | -2.63% | ||
| IMXI - TLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.36% | ||
| MITK - TLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -3.29% | ||
| NRDY - TLS | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.10% | ||
| PUBM - TLS | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| CGNT - TLS | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.44% | ||
More | ||||