CGNX
Price
$60.54
Change
+$0.81 (+1.36%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
10.18B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FCUV
Price
$8.71
Change
-$0.07 (-0.80%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.12M
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGNX vs FCUV

CGNX vs FCUV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGNX vs. FCUV commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGNX is a Hold and FCUV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CGNX: $60.54 vs. FCUV: $8.71)
Brand notoriety: CGNX and FCUV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGNX: 68% vs. FCUV: 1%
Market capitalization -- CGNX: $10.18B vs. FCUV: $6.12M
CGNX [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $10.18B. FCUV’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $6.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $122.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $8.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGNX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFCUV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGNX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FCUV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCUV is a better buy in the long-term than CGNX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGNX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCUV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGNX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • FCUV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCUV is a better buy in the short-term than CGNX.

Price Growth

CGNX (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -7.63% price change this week, while FCUV (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was +54.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -3.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGNX is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

FCUV is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (-3.36% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGNX($10.2B) has a higher market cap than FCUV($6.12M). CGNX YTD gains are higher at: 68.973 vs. FCUV (-73.121). CGNX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 267M vs. FCUV (-4.76M). CGNX has more cash in the bank: 178M vs. FCUV (6.01M). FCUV has less debt than CGNX: FCUV (113K) vs CGNX (74M). CGNX has higher revenues than FCUV: CGNX (1.09B) vs FCUV (113K).
CGNXFCUVCGNX / FCUV
Capitalization10.2B6.12M166,639%
EBITDA267M-4.76M-5,606%
Gain YTD68.973-73.121-94%
P/E Ratio58.21N/A-
Revenue1.09B113K963,717%
Total Cash178M6.01M2,960%
Total Debt74M113K65,487%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGNX vs FCUV: Fundamental Ratings
CGNX
FCUV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
66100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5134
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
36n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCUV's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGNX (62) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that FCUV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGNX’s over the last 12 months.

FCUV's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CGNX (100) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that FCUV’s stock grew similarly to CGNX’s over the last 12 months.

CGNX's SMR Rating (66) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (100) in the null industry. This means that CGNX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

FCUV's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CGNX (51) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that FCUV’s stock grew similarly to CGNX’s over the last 12 months.

CGNX's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (100) in the null industry. This means that CGNX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGNXFCUV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGNX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FCUV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UCTT76.433.42
+4.68%
Ultra Clean Holdings
BRO72.920.84
+1.17%
Brown & Brown
RMSG0.37N/A
+0.57%
Real Messenger Corporation
STHO9.790.02
+0.20%
Star Holdings
NMFC7.560.01
+0.13%
New Mountain Finance Corp

FCUV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCUV and CGNX have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCUV and CGNX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCUV
1D Price
Change %
FCUV100%
-0.80%
CGNX - FCUV
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
VPG - FCUV
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.99%
TRMB - FCUV
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
WATT - FCUV
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
BMI - FCUV
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.87%
More