Advertisement
FCUV vs WATT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUV is a Hold and WATT is a StrongBuy.
| FCUV | WATT | FCUV / WATT | |
| Capitalization | 4.01M | 62.5M | 6% |
| EBITDA | -4.57M | -7.67M | 60% |
| Gain YTD | -82.410 | 183.960 | -45% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 753K | 10.5M | 7% |
| Total Cash | 1.6M | 31.2M | 5% |
| Total Debt | 11.1M | 1.15M | 969% |
FCUV | WATT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 10 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FCUV's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as WATT (12) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that FCUV’s stock grew similarly to WATT’s over the last 12 months.
FCUV's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WATT (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that FCUV’s stock grew similarly to WATT’s over the last 12 months.
WATT's SMR Rating (97) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as FCUV (99) in the null industry. This means that WATT’s stock grew similarly to FCUV’s over the last 12 months.
FCUV's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as WATT (65) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that FCUV’s stock grew similarly to WATT’s over the last 12 months.
FCUV's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WATT (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that FCUV’s stock grew similarly to WATT’s over the last 12 months.
| FCUV | WATT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FCUV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while WATT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FCUV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WATT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FCUV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WATT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FCUV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- WATT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FCUV (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -66.47% price change this week, while WATT (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +5.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.22%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +2.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
FCUV is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
WATT is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (-2.92% weekly)This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
@Telecommunications Equipment (+2.26% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
Advertisement
FCUV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FCUV and CGNX have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCUV and CGNX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUV | 100% | +3.26% | ||
| CGNX - FCUV | 23% Poorly correlated | +4.10% | ||
| VPG - FCUV | 21% Poorly correlated | +5.91% | ||
| TRMB - FCUV | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.44% | ||
| WATT - FCUV | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
| BMI - FCUV | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||
WATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WATT and ITRI have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WATT and ITRI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WATT | 100% | +0.89% | ||
| ITRI - WATT | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CRNT - WATT | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.97% | ||
| ONDS - WATT | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| ASTS - WATT | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| TSAT - WATT | 25% Poorly correlated | +5.54% | ||
More | ||||