Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGVFX vs CWGFX
CGVFX vs CWGFX Comparison
Open Charts CGVFX vs CWGFX
CGVFX vs CWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGVFX vs. CWGFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGVFX is a Hold and CWGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. CGVFX (21.5B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than CGVFX: CWGFX (1.30) vs CGVFX (0.93). CGVFX was incepted earlier than CWGFX: CGVFX (7 years) vs CWGFX (25 years). CGVFX (0.87) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CGVFX (35.00). CGVFX (250) and CWGFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGVFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.48 vs. CWGFX (18.82). CGVFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.36 vs. CWGFX (31.85).
| CGVFX | CWGFX | CGVFX / CWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.79 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.79 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.536 | 13.406 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 160B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.30 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.48 | 18.82 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.90 | 50.18 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.36 | 31.85 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers