Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGVFX vs RWIBX
CGVFX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts CGVFX vs RWIBX
CGVFX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGVFX vs. RWIBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGVFX is a Hold and RWIBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. CGVFX (21.5B). CGVFX pays higher dividends than RWIBX: CGVFX (0.93) vs RWIBX (0.74). CGVFX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: CGVFX (7 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than CGVFX (0.87). RWIBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CGVFX (35.00). CGVFX (250) and RWIBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGVFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.48 vs. RWIBX (17.83). CGVFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.36 vs. RWIBX (27.84).
| CGVFX | RWIBX | CGVFX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.51 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.51 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.536 | 13.017 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 160B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.74 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.48 | 17.83 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.90 | 46.73 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.36 | 27.84 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers