Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs CUT
CGW vs CUT Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs CUT
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$63.79
Change+$0.68 (+1.08%)
Volume$24.76K
Net Assets995.64M
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.58
Change+$0.66 (+2.21%)
Volume$560
Net Assets44.93M
CGW vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. CUT commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a StrongBuy and CUT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGW has more net assets: 996M vs. CUT (44.9M). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: CGW (17.694) vs CUT (-3.425). CGW was incepted earlier than CUT: CGW (18 years) vs CUT (18 years). CGW (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CGW has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CGW | CUT | CGW / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 17.694 | -3.425 | -517% |
| Net Assets | 996M | 44.9M | 2,218% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 32.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 1.12 | 3.28 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% | 8 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 1 day ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been closely correlated with FELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then FELE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 71% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| AWR - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.26% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| XYL - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +2.20% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| BILL - CUT | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| PCH - CUT | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| SON - CUT | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
More | ||||