Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs CUT
CGW vs CUT Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs CUT
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$62.21
Change+$0.14 (+0.23%)
Volume$5.07K
Net Assets973.05M
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.06
Change-$0.60 (-1.96%)
Volume$919
Net Assets47.45M
CGW vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. CUT commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and CUT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGW has more net assets: 973M vs. CUT (47.5M). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: CGW (14.520) vs CUT (-3.174). CGW was incepted earlier than CUT: CGW (18 years) vs CUT (18 years). CGW (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CGW has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CGW | CUT | CGW / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 14.520 | -3.174 | -457% |
| Net Assets | 973M | 47.5M | 2,048% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 32.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 1.11 | 3.21 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been closely correlated with WTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then WTS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y