Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs CUT
CGW vs CUT Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs CUT
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$61.94
Change-$0.30 (-0.48%)
Volume$195
Net Assets969.51M
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$27.72
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Volume$68.15K
Net Assets36.03M
CGW vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. CUT commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and CUT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGW has more net assets: 970M vs. CUT (36M). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: CGW (14.280) vs CUT (-12.452). CGW was incepted earlier than CUT: CGW (19 years) vs CUT (18 years). CGW (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CGW has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CGW | CUT | CGW / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 14.280 | -12.452 | -115% |
| Net Assets | 970M | 36M | 2,694% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 32.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 1.09 | 3.44 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been closely correlated with FELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then FELE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 68% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.28% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| PNR - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||