Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs EAFG
CGXU vs EAFG Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs EAFG
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$28.15
Change-$0.18 (-0.64%)
Volume$538.16K
Net Assets3.91B
Pacer Developed Mkts Csh Cow Gr Ldr ETF
Price$21.80
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
Volume$3.5K
Net Assets2.72M
CGXU vs EAFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. EAFG commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and EAFG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.92B vs. EAFG (2.72M). EAFG (16.028) and CGXU (15.348) have matching annual dividend yield . CGXU was incepted earlier than EAFG: CGXU (4 years) vs EAFG (1 year). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than EAFG (0.65). CGXU has a higher turnover EAFG (33.00) vs EAFG (33.00).
| CGXU | EAFG | CGXU / EAFG | |
| Gain YTD | 15.348 | 16.028 | 96% |
| Net Assets | 3.92B | 2.72M | 144,040% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.65 | 83% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 33.00 | 161% |
| Yield | 1.38 | 1.27 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | EAFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 86% | 20 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -0.64% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 77% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 70% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 66% Closely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
More | ||||
EAFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EAFG and ROG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EAFG and ROG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EAFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAFG | 100% | N/A | ||
| ROG - EAFG | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| RIO - EAFG | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
| EVO - EAFG | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| GSK - EAFG | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
| BHP - EAFG | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
More | ||||