CGXU
Price
$33.62
Change
-$0.81 (-2.35%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Net Assets
6.28B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IDHQ
Price
$42.99
Change
-$0.46 (-1.06%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Net Assets
919.81M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGXU vs IDHQ

CGXU vs IDHQ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) vs. Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ)

Key Takeaways

  • Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) is an actively managed fund targeting long-term capital growth through concentrated international equity exposure, while Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) is a passive ETF tracking a rules-based quality index of developed-market ex-U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks.
  • CGXU typically holds fewer than 100 securities with a higher expense ratio of 0.54%, reflecting active stock selection, compared with IDHQ’s broader diversification of approximately 200 holdings and lower expense ratio of 0.29%.
  • Sector allocations in both funds emphasize industrials, health care, and information technology, though CGXU’s active approach allows greater flexibility in weighting individual names, while IDHQ maintains consistent exposure based on profitability, earnings stability, and dividend records.
  • CGXU offers a thematic tilt toward growth-oriented international companies with potential for higher volatility, whereas IDHQ prioritizes quality factors that may provide more defensive characteristics during market stress.
  • Both ETFs provide investors with non-U.S. developed-market equity exposure outside the United States, serving as complementary or alternative tools for international diversification depending on preference for active management versus systematic quality screening.

Introduction

International equity markets continue to attract investor interest as diversification away from U.S. assets gains attention amid evolving global growth patterns. Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) both target developed markets outside the United States but pursue distinct strategies. CGXU employs active management to select focused holdings, while IDHQ follows a passive, rules-based approach emphasizing quality metrics. The comparison helps investors evaluate trade-offs between concentrated active selection and broad, systematic quality exposure within the same broad asset class.

Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) Overview

Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in international equities. The fund maintains a concentrated portfolio, typically holding between 70 and 90 securities. Top holdings often include companies such as ASML Holding, Novo Nordisk, and Airbus. Sector exposure tends to favor information technology, health care, and industrials, though allocations can shift based on the manager’s outlook. The expense ratio stands at 0.54%. As an actively managed product, CGXU does not track a specific index and instead relies on fundamental research for security selection and rebalancing decisions.

Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) Overview

Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) is a passively managed fund designed to track the S&P Quality Developed ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. The ETF holds approximately 200 securities, providing broad diversification across developed markets excluding the United States. Top holdings typically feature names such as ASML Holding, Roche Holding, Novartis, and Nestlé. Sector weights emphasize industrials, health care, and information technology, with additional exposure to financials and consumer staples. The expense ratio is 0.29%. Rebalancing follows the index methodology, which selects constituents based on quality factors including return on equity, earnings consistency, and financial leverage.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Developed international equities operate within a macroeconomic environment shaped by monetary policy divergence, regional economic growth differentials, and ongoing supply-chain adjustments. Capital flows into quality and growth themes remain influenced by interest-rate expectations and corporate earnings trends across Europe and Asia-Pacific. Regulatory developments around trade, technology standards, and environmental policies continue to affect sector leadership. Both ETFs are positioned to benefit from global expansion in industrials and health care while facing risks from currency fluctuations, geopolitical tensions, and slower growth in certain regions. These structural factors support sustained investor attention to non-U.S. developed-market strategies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, active international strategies such as Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) have shown sensitivity to manager-driven sector rotations and individual company developments, potentially leading to periods of outperformance or underperformance relative to benchmarks. Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) has demonstrated more stable relative behavior tied to its quality-screening process, which can help mitigate downside during volatility spikes. Over broader timeframes, differences in concentration and cost structure influence how each fund responds to earnings seasons, commodity price movements, and shifts in global risk appetite. Investors often evaluate these ETFs based on tolerance for active risk versus preference for systematic factor exposure.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into funds such as Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) or Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) may find the platform useful for further analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) currently aligns with a higher probability of favorable positioning in Tickeron AI analysis. Its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 200 holdings, and systematic quality methodology provide consistent exposure with reduced single-stock risk. Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) offers potential advantages through active management and concentration but carries higher costs and greater reliance on manager decisions. The assessment reflects observable factors including cost efficiency, diversification profile, and trend consistency rather than short-term performance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CGXU vs. IDHQ commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and IDHQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 6.28B vs. IDHQ (920M). IDHQ has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: IDHQ (23.963) vs CGXU (15.126). CGXU was incepted earlier than IDHQ: CGXU (4 years) vs IDHQ (19 years). IDHQ (0.29) has a lower expense ratio than CGXU (0.54). CGXU has a higher turnover IDHQ (41.00) vs IDHQ (41.00).
CGXUIDHQCGXU / IDHQ
Gain YTD15.12623.96363%
Net Assets6.28B920M683%
Total Expense Ratio0.540.29186%
Turnover53.0041.00129%
Yield4.922.01245%
Fund Existence4 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGXUIDHQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGXU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IDHQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMVRX133.03N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Value R
HFMDX26.69N/A
N/A
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Inv
FCIKX18.58-0.07
-0.38%
NYLI PineStone International Eq Inv Cl
MECDX16.68-0.12
-0.71%
NYLI Epoch Capital Growth Class A
RAFGX46.59-0.54
-1.15%
American Funds AMCAP R-6

CGXU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGXU
1D Price
Change %
CGXU100%
-2.37%
SAN - CGXU
67%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
RIO - CGXU
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
BBVA - CGXU
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
NWG - CGXU
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
WDS - CGXU
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
More

IDHQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDHQ has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IDHQ jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDHQ
1D Price
Change %
IDHQ100%
-1.06%
STM - IDHQ
70%
Closely correlated
-4.18%
BHP - IDHQ
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
RIO - IDHQ
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
MT - IDHQ
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
CP - IDHQ
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
More