Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs IPOS
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs IPOS
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$28.32
Change+$0.52 (+1.87%)
Volume$438.3K
Net Assets3.85B
Renaissance International IPO ETF
Price$16.36
Change+$0.27 (+1.68%)
Volume$1.01K
Net Assets4.84M
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. IPOS commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a StrongBuy and IPOS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.85B vs. IPOS (4.84M). IPOS has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: IPOS (35.349) vs CGXU (16.044). CGXU was incepted earlier than IPOS: CGXU (4 years) vs IPOS (11 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than IPOS (0.80). IPOS has a higher turnover CGXU (53.00) vs CGXU (53.00).
| CGXU | IPOS | CGXU / IPOS | |
| Gain YTD | 16.044 | 35.349 | 45% |
| Net Assets | 3.85B | 4.84M | 79,645% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.80 | 68% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 81.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 1.45 | 1.15 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | IPOS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 23 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | +1.87% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 77% Closely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 70% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 66% Closely correlated | +4.87% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| NWG - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||
IPOS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOS and SPG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOS and SPG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPOS | 100% | +1.72% | ||
| SPG - IPOS | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
| ARIS - IPOS | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
| BPPTU - IPOS | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| THG - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| OR - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||