Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs IPOS
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs IPOS
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$26.55
Change-$0.34 (-1.26%)
Volume$901
Net Assets3.77B
Renaissance International IPO ETF
Price$14.47
Change-$0.37 (-2.49%)
Volume$239
Net Assets4.44M
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. IPOS commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and IPOS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.77B vs. IPOS (4.44M). IPOS has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: IPOS (21.700) vs CGXU (8.999). CGXU was incepted earlier than IPOS: CGXU (3 years) vs IPOS (11 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than IPOS (0.80). IPOS has a higher turnover CGXU (36.00) vs CGXU (36.00).
| CGXU | IPOS | CGXU / IPOS | |
| Gain YTD | 8.999 | 21.700 | 41% |
| Net Assets | 3.77B | 4.44M | 84,923% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.80 | 68% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 68.00 | 53% |
| Yield | 0.94 | 0.89 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 73% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| NWG - CGXU | 68% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| RIO - CGXU | 66% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.00% | ||
More | ||||
IPOS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOS and SPG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOS and SPG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPOS | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| SPG - IPOS | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
| ARIS - IPOS | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
| BPT - IPOS | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
| THG - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
| OR - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
More | ||||