Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs IPOS
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs IPOS
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$30.38
Change+$0.28 (+0.93%)
Volume$667.85K
Net Assets4.22B
Renaissance International IPO ETF
Price$17.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.90%)
Volume$359
Net Assets5.36M
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. IPOS commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a StrongBuy and IPOS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 4.22B vs. IPOS (5.36M). IPOS has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: IPOS (47.658) vs CGXU (24.485). CGXU was incepted earlier than IPOS: CGXU (4 years) vs IPOS (11 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than IPOS (0.80). IPOS has a higher turnover CGXU (53.00) vs CGXU (53.00).
| CGXU | IPOS | CGXU / IPOS | |
| Gain YTD | 24.485 | 47.658 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 4.22B | 5.36M | 78,762% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.80 | 68% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 81.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 1.32 | 0.94 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | IPOS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | +0.93% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 75% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 68% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.76% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
More | ||||
IPOS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOS and BPPTU have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOS and BPPTU's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPOS | 100% | +0.85% | ||
| BPPTU - IPOS | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
| THG - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| OR - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| CRC - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
| LSPD - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.75% | ||
More | ||||