Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs IPOS
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs IPOS
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$27.21
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
Volume$238.43K
Net Assets3.79B
Renaissance International IPO ETF
Price$14.73
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
Volume$764
Net Assets4.45M
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. IPOS commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a StrongBuy and IPOS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.79B vs. IPOS (4.45M). IPOS has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: IPOS (21.842) vs CGXU (11.496). CGXU was incepted earlier than IPOS: CGXU (3 years) vs IPOS (11 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than IPOS (0.80). IPOS has a higher turnover CGXU (36.00) vs CGXU (36.00).
| CGXU | IPOS | CGXU / IPOS | |
| Gain YTD | 11.496 | 21.842 | 53% |
| Net Assets | 3.79B | 4.45M | 85,044% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.80 | 68% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 81.00 | 44% |
| Yield | 1.44 | 1.19 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | IPOS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 73% Closely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| NWG - CGXU | 66% Closely correlated | +3.31% | ||
| RIO - CGXU | 66% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||
IPOS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOS and SPG have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOS and SPG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPOS | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| SPG - IPOS | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
| ARIS - IPOS | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
| BPPTU - IPOS | 9% Poorly correlated | -18.52% | ||
| THG - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
| OR - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.72% | ||
More | ||||