Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs IPOS
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs IPOS
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$26.49
Change-$0.20 (-0.75%)
Volume$503.41K
Net Assets3.7B
Renaissance International IPO ETF
Price$15.16
Change-$0.10 (-0.66%)
Volume$584
Net Assets4.61M
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. IPOS commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and IPOS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.7B vs. IPOS (4.61M). IPOS has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: IPOS (25.401) vs CGXU (8.546). CGXU was incepted earlier than IPOS: CGXU (3 years) vs IPOS (11 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than IPOS (0.80). IPOS has a higher turnover CGXU (36.00) vs CGXU (36.00).
| CGXU | IPOS | CGXU / IPOS | |
| Gain YTD | 8.546 | 25.401 | 34% |
| Net Assets | 3.7B | 4.61M | 80,308% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.80 | 68% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 81.00 | 44% |
| Yield | 1.45 | 1.15 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | IPOS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 9 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -0.75% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 78% Closely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 70% Closely correlated | -2.44% | ||
| NWG - CGXU | 66% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| BBVA - CGXU | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||
IPOS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOS and SPG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOS and SPG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPOS | 100% | -0.64% | ||
| SPG - IPOS | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
| ARIS - IPOS | 17% Poorly correlated | -7.43% | ||
| BPPTU - IPOS | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
| THG - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.63% | ||
| OR - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||