Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs IPOS
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs IPOS
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$29.15
Change+$0.23 (+0.80%)
Volume$477.74K
Net Assets4.13B
Renaissance International IPO ETF
Price$15.86
Change+$0.17 (+1.08%)
Volume$1.86K
Net Assets4.72M
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. IPOS commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and IPOS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 4.13B vs. IPOS (4.72M). IPOS has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: IPOS (31.222) vs CGXU (19.445). CGXU was incepted earlier than IPOS: CGXU (4 years) vs IPOS (11 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than IPOS (0.80). IPOS has a higher turnover CGXU (53.00) vs CGXU (53.00).
| CGXU | IPOS | CGXU / IPOS | |
| Gain YTD | 19.445 | 31.222 | 62% |
| Net Assets | 4.13B | 4.72M | 87,529% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.80 | 68% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 81.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 1.27 | 0.94 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | IPOS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 76% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 69% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 67% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| SHOP - CGXU | 67% Closely correlated | +5.08% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||
IPOS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOS and THG have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOS and THG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPOS | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| THG - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
| OR - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +4.41% | ||
| CRC - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| LSPD - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| EQT - IPOS | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||