CHAT
Price
$90.89
Change
+$2.10 (+2.37%)
Updated
Jul 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.95B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HACK
Price
$110.11
Change
+$3.14 (+2.94%)
Updated
Jul 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.64B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHAT vs HACK

CHAT vs HACK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) vs. Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK)

Key Takeaways

  • CHAT is an actively managed thematic ETF targeting generative artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies, while HACK is a passively managed ETF tracking a cybersecurity-focused index.
  • CHAT typically holds 45–60 securities with a higher expense ratio of 0.75%, offering broader exposure across AI hardware, software, and infrastructure providers.
  • HACK maintains a concentrated portfolio of approximately 22–24 holdings with a lower expense ratio of 0.60%, emphasizing pure-play cybersecurity companies and select technology enablers.
  • Sector allocations in CHAT center on technology and communication services, whereas HACK concentrates on information technology with a cybersecurity sub-theme, leading to distinct risk and return drivers.
  • Both ETFs provide targeted exposure within the broader technology sector but differ in strategy type, cost structure, and sensitivity to AI adoption versus cybersecurity spending trends.
  • Investors comparing the two should evaluate preferences for active thematic selection versus index-based sector purity alongside overall diversification needs.

Introduction

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) attract investor attention amid rising enterprise spending on artificial intelligence and digital security. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they offer complementary yet differentiated exposure within the technology sector. CHAT emphasizes generative AI innovation across hardware and software, while HACK focuses on companies providing cybersecurity solutions. The comparison helps investors assess structural distinctions in strategy, holdings concentration, fees, and thematic positioning to align with specific market views on AI growth versus cyber defense priorities.

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) Overview

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in May 2023. It seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in 25 to 50 global companies involved in generative artificial intelligence and related technologies. The fund holds approximately 45–60 securities, with top positions often including NVIDIA Corp, Alphabet Inc, Broadcom Inc, Micron Technology Inc, and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Sector allocations tilt heavily toward technology and communication services. CHAT carries an expense ratio of 0.75% and features no fixed index, allowing the manager flexibility in security selection and rebalancing based on evolving AI themes. This active approach distinguishes it from passive peers and supports dynamic exposure to AI infrastructure, semiconductors, and software innovators.

Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) Overview

Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund launched in November 2014. It seeks investment results that correspond to the total return performance of the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index before fees and expenses. The fund typically holds 22–24 securities, with top holdings frequently featuring Palo Alto Networks Inc, CrowdStrike Holdings Inc, Cisco Systems Inc, Fortinet Inc, and Broadcom Inc. Sector exposure concentrates in information technology, particularly cybersecurity providers and related infrastructure. HACK maintains an expense ratio of 0.60% and follows a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic index rebalancing. Its concentrated structure and lower cost profile provide targeted access to the cybersecurity theme within the broader technology sector.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to experience robust capital allocation toward artificial intelligence capabilities and cybersecurity defenses. Enterprise adoption of generative AI tools drives demand for semiconductors, cloud infrastructure, and specialized software, benefiting companies with relevant exposure. Simultaneously, escalating cyber threats and regulatory requirements for data protection sustain spending on security platforms and services. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and corporate capital expenditure cycles influence both themes, while geopolitical developments can accelerate digital resilience investments. Risks include valuation compression in high-growth areas, potential regulatory scrutiny on technology platforms, and shifts in IT budgets during economic slowdowns. These dynamics create an environment where AI-centric and cybersecurity-focused strategies may respond differently to sector rotation and earnings trends.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, CHAT has exhibited sensitivity to AI-related earnings announcements and semiconductor demand cycles, leading to periods of elevated volatility tied to technology leadership shifts. HACK has shown steadier behavior linked to cybersecurity contract wins and broader information technology spending patterns, with relatively lower sensitivity to single-theme hype. During recent weeks and months, relative positioning has reflected divergence between AI infrastructure momentum and cybersecurity spending resilience amid varying macroeconomic signals. CHAT’s active management and wider holdings base support potential outperformance in strong AI environments, while HACK’s index discipline and lower expense ratio may appeal in periods favoring established cybersecurity leaders. Both funds demonstrate correlation with overall technology sector movements but diverge in response to specific catalysts such as AI model releases versus data breach incidents or regulatory updates.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like CHAT and HACK may find the tool useful for ongoing market analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to HACK due to its lower expense ratio, established passive index methodology, and concentrated exposure to a resilient cybersecurity sub-sector with consistent enterprise demand. CHAT’s active management and higher fee structure introduce greater variability, though its broader AI thematic reach could deliver advantages during periods of accelerated generative AI adoption. Investors should weigh these trade-offs against individual risk tolerance and portfolio objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CHAT vs. HACK commentary
Jul 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHAT is a Hold and HACK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HACK has more net assets: 2.64B vs. CHAT (1.95B). CHAT has a higher annual dividend yield than HACK: CHAT (50.594) vs HACK (33.097). CHAT was incepted earlier than HACK: CHAT (3 years) vs HACK (12 years). HACK (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than CHAT (0.75). CHAT has a higher turnover HACK (25.00) vs HACK (25.00).
CHATHACKCHAT / HACK
Gain YTD50.59433.097153%
Net Assets1.95B2.64B74%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.60125%
Turnover32.0025.00128%
Yield1.720.063,015%
Fund Existence3 years12 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHATHACK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HACK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNDS50.690.06
+0.12%
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
PMMY26.76N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May
PML7.64N/A
N/A
PIMCO Municipal Income FUND II
BAUG53.62-0.02
-0.03%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF Aug
MCH27.94-0.96
-3.31%
Matthews China Active ETF

CHAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHAT has been loosely correlated with COHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHAT jumps, then COHR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHAT
1D Price
Change %
CHAT100%
-5.06%
COHR - CHAT
64%
Loosely correlated
-9.57%
ANET - CHAT
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.98%
ORCL - CHAT
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
HPE - CHAT
48%
Loosely correlated
-6.19%
DELL - CHAT
41%
Loosely correlated
-7.27%
More

HACK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with RBRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then RBRK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HACK
1D Price
Change %
HACK100%
-0.12%
RBRK - HACK
69%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
NET - HACK
68%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
S - HACK
66%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
ATEN - HACK
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.47%
CVLT - HACK
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.01%
More