Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) attract investor attention amid rising enterprise spending on artificial intelligence and digital security. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they offer complementary yet differentiated exposure within the technology sector. CHAT emphasizes generative AI innovation across hardware and software, while HACK focuses on companies providing cybersecurity solutions. The comparison helps investors assess structural distinctions in strategy, holdings concentration, fees, and thematic positioning to align with specific market views on AI growth versus cyber defense priorities.
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in May 2023. It seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in 25 to 50 global companies involved in generative artificial intelligence and related technologies. The fund holds approximately 45–60 securities, with top positions often including NVIDIA Corp, Alphabet Inc, Broadcom Inc, Micron Technology Inc, and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Sector allocations tilt heavily toward technology and communication services. CHAT carries an expense ratio of 0.75% and features no fixed index, allowing the manager flexibility in security selection and rebalancing based on evolving AI themes. This active approach distinguishes it from passive peers and supports dynamic exposure to AI infrastructure, semiconductors, and software innovators.
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund launched in November 2014. It seeks investment results that correspond to the total return performance of the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index before fees and expenses. The fund typically holds 22–24 securities, with top holdings frequently featuring Palo Alto Networks Inc, CrowdStrike Holdings Inc, Cisco Systems Inc, Fortinet Inc, and Broadcom Inc. Sector exposure concentrates in information technology, particularly cybersecurity providers and related infrastructure. HACK maintains an expense ratio of 0.60% and follows a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic index rebalancing. Its concentrated structure and lower cost profile provide targeted access to the cybersecurity theme within the broader technology sector.
The technology sector continues to experience robust capital allocation toward artificial intelligence capabilities and cybersecurity defenses. Enterprise adoption of generative AI tools drives demand for semiconductors, cloud infrastructure, and specialized software, benefiting companies with relevant exposure. Simultaneously, escalating cyber threats and regulatory requirements for data protection sustain spending on security platforms and services. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and corporate capital expenditure cycles influence both themes, while geopolitical developments can accelerate digital resilience investments. Risks include valuation compression in high-growth areas, potential regulatory scrutiny on technology platforms, and shifts in IT budgets during economic slowdowns. These dynamics create an environment where AI-centric and cybersecurity-focused strategies may respond differently to sector rotation and earnings trends.
In recent market cycles, CHAT has exhibited sensitivity to AI-related earnings announcements and semiconductor demand cycles, leading to periods of elevated volatility tied to technology leadership shifts. HACK has shown steadier behavior linked to cybersecurity contract wins and broader information technology spending patterns, with relatively lower sensitivity to single-theme hype. During recent weeks and months, relative positioning has reflected divergence between AI infrastructure momentum and cybersecurity spending resilience amid varying macroeconomic signals. CHAT’s active management and wider holdings base support potential outperformance in strong AI environments, while HACK’s index discipline and lower expense ratio may appeal in periods favoring established cybersecurity leaders. Both funds demonstrate correlation with overall technology sector movements but diverge in response to specific catalysts such as AI model releases versus data breach incidents or regulatory updates.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like CHAT and HACK may find the tool useful for ongoing market analysis.
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to HACK due to its lower expense ratio, established passive index methodology, and concentrated exposure to a resilient cybersecurity sub-sector with consistent enterprise demand. CHAT’s active management and higher fee structure introduce greater variability, though its broader AI thematic reach could deliver advantages during periods of accelerated generative AI adoption. Investors should weigh these trade-offs against individual risk tolerance and portfolio objectives.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| CHAT | HACK | CHAT / HACK | |
| Gain YTD | 50.594 | 33.097 | 153% |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 2.64B | 74% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.60 | 125% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 25.00 | 128% |
| Yield | 1.72 | 0.06 | 3,015% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 12 years | - |
| CHAT | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 20 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHAT has been loosely correlated with COHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHAT jumps, then COHR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAT | 100% | -5.06% | ||
| COHR - CHAT | 64% Loosely correlated | -9.57% | ||
| ANET - CHAT | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.98% | ||
| ORCL - CHAT | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| HPE - CHAT | 48% Loosely correlated | -6.19% | ||
| DELL - CHAT | 41% Loosely correlated | -7.27% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with RBRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then RBRK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACK | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| RBRK - HACK | 69% Closely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| NET - HACK | 68% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| S - HACK | 66% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| ATEN - HACK | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.47% | ||
| CVLT - HACK | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
More | ||||