CHAT
Price
$84.67
Change
-$2.00 (-2.31%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:34 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.85B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SKYY
Price
$132.17
Change
+$2.45 (+1.89%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:51 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.72B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHAT vs SKYY

CHAT vs SKYY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 24, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) vs. First Trust Cloud Computing ETF (SKYY)

Key Takeaways

  • CHAT is an actively managed thematic ETF targeting generative artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies, while SKYY is a passively managed ETF tracking an index of cloud computing companies.
  • CHAT carries a higher expense ratio of 0.75% compared to SKYY’s 0.60%, reflecting its active management approach versus SKYY’s index-tracking structure.
  • Both ETFs concentrate heavily in the technology sector, but CHAT emphasizes generative AI leaders such as semiconductor and software firms, whereas SKYY focuses on cloud infrastructure, services, and enabling technologies.
  • CHAT typically holds around 50 securities with concentrated top positions in names like NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), while SKYY holds approximately 60-64 holdings with broader exposure across cloud providers and related firms.
  • Investors seeking pure-play generative AI exposure may prefer CHAT’s active strategy, while those prioritizing lower costs and established cloud computing infrastructure may favor SKYY’s passive approach.
  • Both ETFs operate within the broader technology and digital transformation theme, offering differentiated entry points into high-growth areas with varying risk and diversification profiles.

Introduction

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and First Trust Cloud Computing ETF (SKYY) represent two distinct yet overlapping approaches to investing in transformative technology themes. CHAT provides active exposure to generative AI innovations, while SKYY delivers passive access to the cloud computing ecosystem that underpins much of modern digital infrastructure. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative vehicles for investors seeking targeted technology sector exposure. In the current environment of rapid AI adoption and enterprise cloud migration, comparing their structural features helps clarify positioning for thematic portfolios.

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) Overview

The Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in May 2023. It seeks to invest in companies involved in generative AI and related technologies globally. The fund typically holds around 50 securities. Top holdings often include NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO), Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), and Micron Technology Inc. (MU). Sector allocations are dominated by technology (approximately 75-79%) and communication services (approximately 15-18%), with smaller weights in other areas. CHAT charges an expense ratio of 0.75%. Its active management allows flexibility in selecting companies driving AI advancements, distinguishing it from passive thematic peers.

First Trust Cloud Computing ETF (SKYY) Overview

The First Trust Cloud Computing ETF (SKYY) is a passively managed fund launched in July 2011 that tracks the ISE Cloud Computing Index. The index targets companies engaged in cloud computing infrastructure, platforms, and services. SKYY typically holds 60-64 securities with modified equal weighting and caps. Representative top holdings include Arista Networks Inc., Nutanix Inc., Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), and Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL). Sector exposure centers on technology (approximately 88%) and communication services (approximately 7-8%). The fund features an expense ratio of 0.60%. Its index-based methodology provides systematic, rules-driven exposure to the cloud computing value chain.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the expansive technology sector, particularly the intersection of artificial intelligence, digital infrastructure, and enterprise software. Key catalysts include accelerating enterprise adoption of generative AI tools, ongoing migration of workloads to cloud environments, and capital expenditures by hyperscale providers. Macroeconomic drivers such as interest rate expectations and corporate spending cycles influence sector momentum. Regulatory developments around data privacy, AI governance, and antitrust scrutiny in technology represent ongoing considerations. Risks include valuation compression in high-growth names, supply chain disruptions in semiconductors, and competitive intensity among cloud service providers. The broader theme benefits from structural tailwinds in digital transformation while facing cyclical pressures tied to economic conditions.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, CHAT’s active focus on generative AI leaders has aligned it closely with semiconductor and software innovators, potentially amplifying upside during periods of strong AI-related earnings. SKYY’s cloud-centric mandate positions it to capture demand for scalable infrastructure, often exhibiting sensitivity to enterprise IT spending patterns and data center buildouts. Relative positioning highlights CHAT’s potentially higher concentration risk due to active stock selection versus SKYY’s diversified index approach. Volatility differences stem from CHAT’s emphasis on emerging AI applications compared with SKYY’s exposure to established cloud platforms. Both benefit from sector rotation toward technology but respond differently to shifts in growth expectations and capital allocation within the broader digital economy.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic edge to SKYY at present due to its lower expense ratio, established passive methodology, and broad diversification within the cloud computing theme. CHAT offers compelling active exposure to generative AI but carries higher costs and concentration considerations. Investors should evaluate alignment with individual objectives, risk tolerance, and time horizons.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CHAT vs. SKYY commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHAT is a Hold and SKYY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKYY has more net assets: 2.72B vs. CHAT (1.85B). CHAT has a higher annual dividend yield than SKYY: CHAT (46.998) vs SKYY (7.445). CHAT was incepted earlier than SKYY: CHAT (3 years) vs SKYY (15 years). SKYY (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than CHAT (0.75). CHAT has a higher turnover SKYY (30.00) vs SKYY (30.00).
CHATSKYYCHAT / SKYY
Gain YTD46.9987.445631%
Net Assets1.85B2.72B68%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.60125%
Turnover92.0030.00307%
Yield1.720.00-
Fund Existence3 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHATSKYY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SKYY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UFOD23.670.14
+0.59%
Tuttle Capital UFO Disclosure ETF
MYHE24.90N/A
N/A
State Street®My2031 HighYield CrptBdETF
GIGB44.96-0.14
-0.32%
Goldman Sachs Acss Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF
FLJH44.79-0.43
-0.95%
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
BHV12.51-0.26
-2.04%
BlackRock Virginia Muni

CHAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHAT has been loosely correlated with COHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHAT jumps, then COHR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHAT
1D Price
Change %
CHAT100%
-0.71%
COHR - CHAT
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
ANET - CHAT
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
HPE - CHAT
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
ORCL - CHAT
49%
Loosely correlated
-4.61%
DELL - CHAT
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
More

SKYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SKYY has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SKYY jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKYY
1D Price
Change %
SKYY100%
N/A
CRWD - SKYY
69%
Closely correlated
-2.65%
GTLB - SKYY
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.60%
TEAM - SKYY
64%
Loosely correlated
-6.15%
MDB - SKYY
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
FIVN - SKYY
63%
Loosely correlated
-5.25%
More