CHAT
Price
$88.00
Change
+$0.20 (+0.23%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
1.86B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XNTK
Price
$357.31
Change
-$0.28 (-0.08%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
1.98B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHAT vs XNTK

CHAT vs XNTK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) vs. State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK)

Key Takeaways

  • CHAT is an actively managed thematic ETF targeting generative artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies, while XNTK is a passive ETF tracking an equal-weighted index of 35 leading U.S.-listed technology companies.
  • CHAT maintains a concentrated portfolio of approximately 50 holdings with heavy emphasis on semiconductors and software, whereas XNTK offers broader equal-weighted exposure across 35 technology names with annual rebalancing.
  • Expense ratios differ significantly: CHAT charges 0.75% annually due to active management, compared to XNTK’s lower 0.35% passive structure.
  • Sector allocations for both tilt heavily toward information technology, but CHAT includes notable communication services exposure while XNTK incorporates select consumer discretionary technology-related firms.
  • CHAT provides specialized generative AI thematic positioning, potentially offering higher conviction in AI infrastructure and applications, while XNTK delivers diversified technology sector exposure through systematic index methodology.
  • Liquidity profiles reflect institutional interest in both, with XNTK’s longer history since 2000 supporting established trading volumes relative to CHAT’s 2023 launch.

Introduction

Investors seeking technology exposure increasingly compare specialized AI-focused strategies against established sector benchmarks. The Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and the State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) both target the information technology space but pursue distinct approaches. CHAT employs active management to capture generative AI opportunities globally, while XNTK passively replicates an equal-weighted technology index. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer alternative pathways for investors pursuing technology growth amid ongoing innovation cycles, capital allocation shifts, and evolving semiconductor demand. The comparison highlights differences in cost, diversification, and thematic precision relevant to portfolio construction decisions.

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) Overview

The Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) is an actively managed fund launched in May 2023 that seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in equity securities of companies involved in generative artificial intelligence and related technologies. The strategy allocates at least 80% of assets to AI and technology firms globally, including emerging markets. The portfolio typically holds around 50 securities with a focus on platforms, infrastructure, enterprise software, and consumer applications. Top holdings often include NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL), and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Sector allocations concentrate in information technology (approximately 77%) and communication services (approximately 17%). The fund’s gross expense ratio stands at 0.75%. As an actively managed vehicle, CHAT relies on an investment committee for security selection rather than strict index replication, distinguishing it through thematic conviction in generative AI trends.

State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) Overview

The State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) is a passive fund launched in 2000 that seeks to track the performance of the NYSE Technology Index before fees and expenses. The index comprises 35 leading U.S.-listed technology-related companies selected based on market capitalization, liquidity, and revenue criteria, with at least 75% headquartered in the United States. The index applies equal weighting at its annual rebalance. Top holdings typically feature Micron Technology Inc. (MU), Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL), Intel Corporation (INTC), and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD). Holdings number 35, spanning information technology and select consumer discretionary technology names. The fund’s gross expense ratio is 0.35%. XNTK provides systematic, rules-based exposure with transparent rebalancing methodology focused on established technology leaders.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from structural demand for semiconductors, cloud computing, and digital transformation initiatives. Generative AI represents a key catalyst driving capital expenditures in data centers and specialized hardware. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, corporate earnings cycles, and supply chain dynamics influence sector performance. Regulatory developments around data privacy, export controls on advanced chips, and antitrust scrutiny add layers of complexity. Broader market rotation toward growth-oriented assets and sustained enterprise adoption of AI tools support thematic interest, though valuation levels and potential slowdowns in capital spending pose ongoing risks for technology investors.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited sensitivity to semiconductor earnings and AI-related news flow, with CHAT’s active approach potentially amplifying exposure to high-conviction generative AI names during periods of sector momentum. XNTK’s equal-weighted construction has historically moderated concentration risk compared to market-cap-weighted peers, leading to more balanced contributions from holdings across recent weeks and months. Volatility differences arise from CHAT’s thematic focus versus XNTK’s diversified index methodology. Relative positioning reflects CHAT’s tilt toward emerging AI applications and infrastructure, while XNTK maintains steady exposure to established technology leaders amid broader sector rotation patterns.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on ETFs like CHAT and XNTK may find the platform useful for refining their analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic edge to XNTK due to its lower expense ratio, established index methodology, and diversified equal-weighted exposure across 35 holdings. CHAT’s higher cost and active thematic mandate introduce greater selectivity risk, though its generative AI focus could deliver outperformance in environments of strong sector momentum. The choice ultimately depends on investor preference for cost efficiency and broad technology representation versus specialized thematic conviction.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CHAT vs. XNTK commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHAT is a Buy and XNTK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XNTK has more net assets: 1.98B vs. CHAT (1.86B). CHAT has a higher annual dividend yield than XNTK: CHAT (49.254) vs XNTK (28.698). CHAT was incepted earlier than XNTK: CHAT (3 years) vs XNTK (26 years). XNTK (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than CHAT (0.75). CHAT has a higher turnover XNTK (16.00) vs XNTK (16.00).
CHATXNTKCHAT / XNTK
Gain YTD49.25428.698172%
Net Assets1.86B1.98B94%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.35214%
Turnover92.0016.00575%
Yield2.020.161,275%
Fund Existence3 years26 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHATXNTK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XNTK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTSMX184.100.90
+0.49%
Vanguard MStar Total Stk Mkt Idx Invest
ACIPX17.300.07
+0.41%
American Century Mid Cap Value G
NAPIX84.40N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager International Sm Cp I
FPHAX35.95N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Port
FEUCX22.05N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Glbl Capital Apprec C

XNTK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XNTK has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XNTK jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XNTK
1D Price
Change %
XNTK100%
-0.08%
TSM - XNTK
78%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
ADI - XNTK
73%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
ABNB - XNTK
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
SE - XNTK
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
SNOW - XNTK
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
More