Advertisement
CHPS vs KLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPS is a Buy and KLAC is a Buy.
KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CHPS | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CWVX | 15.69 | 0.47 | +3.09% |
| Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX) | |||
| MTYY | 17.48 | 0.20 | +1.15% |
| GraniteShares YieldBOOST MSTR ETF (MTYY) | |||
| MLPD | 24.13 | 0.21 | +0.87% |
| Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) | |||
| UYLD | 50.75 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF (UYLD) | |||
| AGD | 11.49 | -0.23 | -1.96% |
| abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund | |||
CHPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHPS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPS | 100% | +1.80% | ||
| LRCX - CHPS | 90% Closely correlated | +3.53% | ||
| AMAT - CHPS | 87% Closely correlated | +3.50% | ||
| NVMI - CHPS | 85% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| KLAC - CHPS | 84% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| ASML - CHPS | 83% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
More | ||||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | +2.77% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 87% Closely correlated | +3.53% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 87% Closely correlated | +3.50% | ||
| NVMI - KLAC | 86% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| ONTO - KLAC | 81% Closely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 81% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
More | ||||