CHTR
Price
$309.75
Change
-$70.25 (-18.49%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
41B
89 days until earnings call
FYBR
Price
$36.67
Change
-$0.06 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.02B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHTR vs FYBR

Header iconCHTR vs FYBR Comparison
Open Charts CHTR vs FYBRBanner chart's image
Charter Communications
Price$309.75
Change-$70.25 (-18.49%)
Volume$9.64M
Capitalization41B
Frontier Communications Parent
Price$36.67
Change-$0.06 (-0.16%)
Volume$2.04M
Capitalization6.02B
CHTR vs FYBR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHTR vs. FYBR commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHTR is a Buy and FYBR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CHTR: $309.75 vs. FYBR: $36.67)
Brand notoriety: CHTR and FYBR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHTR: 700% vs. FYBR: 66%
Market capitalization -- CHTR: $41B vs. FYBR: $6.02B
CHTR [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $41B. FYBR’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHTR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFYBR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHTR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FYBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CHTR and FYBR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHTR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FYBR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHTR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FYBR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CHTR and FYBR are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CHTR (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -18.93% price change this week, while FYBR (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHTR is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

FYBR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+2.05% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHTR($41B) has a higher market cap than FYBR($6.02B). FYBR has higher P/E ratio than CHTR: FYBR (199.42) vs CHTR (9.47). FYBR YTD gains are higher at: 5.677 vs. CHTR (-9.633). CHTR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.7B vs. FYBR (2.19B). FYBR has more cash in the bank: 2.2B vs. CHTR (709M). FYBR has less debt than CHTR: FYBR (11.3B) vs CHTR (97.8B). CHTR has higher revenues than FYBR: CHTR (54.6B) vs FYBR (5.68B).
CHTRFYBRCHTR / FYBR
Capitalization41B6.02B681%
EBITDA20.7B2.19B947%
Gain YTD-9.6335.677-170%
P/E Ratio9.47199.425%
Revenue54.6B5.68B962%
Total Cash709M2.2B32%
Total Debt97.8B11.3B865%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHTR: Fundamental Ratings
CHTR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
26
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
31

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHTRFYBR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETB14.520.08
+0.55%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund
COWS31.150.10
+0.33%
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
JHI13.970.04
+0.32%
John Hancock Investors Trust Capital Stock
TVE23.330.05
+0.19%
Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1999 Series A due May 1 2029
ACWV118.600.01
+0.01%
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF

CHTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHTR has been closely correlated with LBRDK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHTR jumps, then LBRDK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHTR
1D Price
Change %
CHTR100%
-18.49%
LBRDK - CHTR
83%
Closely correlated
-19.05%
LBRDA - CHTR
81%
Closely correlated
-19.14%
CMCSA - CHTR
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.78%
LBRDB - CHTR
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LBTYA - CHTR
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
More

FYBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYBR has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FYBR jumps, then S could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FYBR
1D Price
Change %
FYBR100%
-0.16%
S - FYBR
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
CHTR - FYBR
32%
Poorly correlated
-18.49%
CMCSA - FYBR
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.78%
ASTS - FYBR
27%
Poorly correlated
-9.53%
USM - FYBR
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.41%
More