This comparison examines CHTR and LBRDK, two intertwined players in the U.S. broadband and cable sector. Charter operates as the nation's largest cable provider under the Spectrum brand, while Liberty Broadband functions primarily as a holding company with significant exposure to Charter and regional assets. Investors tracking telecom consolidation, value plays amid cord-cutting trends, or merger arbitrage opportunities will find this analysis relevant. Recent market activity underscores their shared vulnerabilities to subscriber shifts and competitive threats from fiber and satellite providers, offering insights into relative performance and positioning.
Charter Communications (CHTR) provides video, internet, and voice services to over 30 million customers via its Spectrum network, dominating the cable broadband market. In recent weeks, the stock has faced heightened volatility, culminating in a sharp single-day drop exceeding 25% following a Q1 earnings report that missed expectations on earnings per share (EPS) of $9.17 versus consensus around $10. Sentiment has soured due to ongoing residential broadband subscriber losses—amid rising competition from fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) networks and satellite internet—and softer mobile growth. Despite this, revenue slightly beat estimates at $13.6 billion, buoyed by enterprise services. Trading near its 52-week low of $178 with a market cap of $22.8 billion and PE ratio (price-to-earnings) of 4.97, CHTR reflects discounted valuation amid broader sector pressures.
Liberty Broadband (LBRDK) is a holding company controlled by John Malone, with its primary asset being a 28% economic interest in CHTR and a stake in GCI Liberty, a rural Alaska provider facing a planned spin-off. Recent performance mirrors CHTR's trajectory, with shares dropping over 25% in tandem after Charter's earnings disappointment, trading near 52-week lows around $42 with a $6 billion market cap. Negative EPS of -$16.30 underscores its non-operating structure and exposure to investee volatility. Key developments include progress toward a 2027 merger with Charter, pending GCI separation, which has influenced sentiment but introduced uncertainty. YTD gains evaporated in the pullback, highlighting leveraged risk to core holdings.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, and long/short pairs, with annualized returns ranging from +15% to +170%, win rates of 48%–88%, profit factors up to 6.94, and trade durations from 1 day to 55 days. Examples include a semiconductor bot at +105% return (64% win rate) trading NVDA and AVGO, and a communications tech bot at high profit-to-drawdown ratios focusing on ASTS and CIEN. Ideal for current volatile conditions, they offer statistical edges via backtested performance. Explore these tools to enhance your trading across market styles.
CHTR operates a direct-service model with recurring broadband revenue, contrasting LBRDK's passive investment vehicle reliant on CHTR dividends and appreciation. Growth drivers differ: Charter pursues mobile expansion and enterprise fiber, while Liberty leverages its stake value amid the pending merger. Recent momentum shows synchronized declines, but CHTR exhibits greater stability with positive EPS versus LBRDK's losses. Risk factors include subscriber churn for both, amplified by leverage for Liberty, plus merger regulatory hurdles. Sector exposure ties them to communications services, where sentiment favors undervalued operators over pure holdings in recent activity.
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward CHTR over LBRDK in the near term, citing superior long-term buy signals from trend consistency, operational cash flows, and post-earnings valuation at a sub-5 PE ratio despite volatility. Liberty's amplified downside from its stake exposure and negative earnings adds relative risk, though merger catalysts could narrow the gap probabilistically. This positioning reflects observable momentum and stability metrics rather than guarantees.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHTR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLBRDK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHTR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBRDK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHTR (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -9.28% price change this week, while LBRDK (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -9.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -4.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.86%.
CHTR is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
LBRDK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CHTR | LBRDK | CHTR / LBRDK | |
| Capitalization | 15.5B | 4.25B | 365% |
| EBITDA | 21.2B | -3.16B | -671% |
| Gain YTD | -39.531 | -39.053 | 101% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.42 | 6.45 | 53% |
| Revenue | 54.6B | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 517M | 51M | 1,014% |
| Total Debt | 96.8B | 2.57B | 3,774% |
CHTR | LBRDK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 87 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHTR's Valuation (61) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LBRDK (87) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CHTR’s stock grew similarly to LBRDK’s over the last 12 months.
CHTR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LBRDK (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CHTR’s stock grew similarly to LBRDK’s over the last 12 months.
CHTR's SMR Rating (33) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBRDK (99) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CHTR’s stock grew significantly faster than LBRDK’s over the last 12 months.
CHTR's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LBRDK (87) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CHTR’s stock grew similarly to LBRDK’s over the last 12 months.
LBRDK's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CHTR (97) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that LBRDK’s stock grew similarly to CHTR’s over the last 12 months.
| CHTR | LBRDK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 58% | 9 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 68% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RXD | 19.55 | 1.06 | +5.72% |
| ProShares UltraShort Health Care | |||
| EBI | 64.88 | 0.67 | +1.05% |
| The RBB Fund Trust Longview Advantage ETF | |||
| FDVV | 60.59 | 0.26 | +0.43% |
| Fidelity High Dividend ETF | |||
| PFRL | 49.62 | 0.11 | +0.21% |
| PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF | |||
| DPG | 14.10 | -0.09 | -0.63% |
| Duff & Phelps Utility and Infrastructure Fund | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHTR has been closely correlated with LBRDK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHTR jumps, then LBRDK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHTR | 100% | -4.37% | ||
| LBRDK - CHTR | 100% Closely correlated | -4.05% | ||
| LBRDA - CHTR | 100% Closely correlated | -4.18% | ||
| CMCSA - CHTR | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| CABO - CHTR | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.83% | ||
| LBRDP - CHTR | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBRDK has been closely correlated with LBRDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBRDK jumps, then LBRDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBRDK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBRDK | 100% | -4.05% | ||
| LBRDA - LBRDK | 100% Closely correlated | -4.18% | ||
| CHTR - LBRDK | 100% Closely correlated | -4.37% | ||
| CMCSA - LBRDK | 72% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| CABO - LBRDK | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.83% | ||
| SHEN - LBRDK | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
More | ||||