CIA
Price
$3.76
Change
-$0.04 (-1.05%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
190.42M
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GNW
Price
$9.88
Change
+$0.02 (+0.20%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.73B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIA vs GNW

CIA vs GNW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIA vs. GNW commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIA is a Hold and GNW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CIA: $3.76 vs. GNW: $9.88)
Brand notoriety: CIA: Not notable vs. GNW: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIA: 81% vs. GNW: 94%
Market capitalization -- CIA: $190.42M vs. GNW: $3.73B
CIA [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $190.42M. GNW’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $3.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $154.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $18.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGNW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GNW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GNW is a better buy in the long-term than CIA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GNW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CIA and GNW are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CIA (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -5.29% price change this week, while GNW (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -2.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -4.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

GNW is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-4.09% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNW($3.73B) has a higher market cap than CIA($190M). GNW has higher P/E ratio than CIA: GNW (19.37) vs CIA (17.09). GNW YTD gains are higher at: 9.413 vs. CIA (-22.153). GNW has more cash in the bank: 8.51B vs. CIA (37.4M). CIA has less debt than GNW: CIA (30M) vs GNW (1.51B). GNW has higher revenues than CIA: GNW (7.07B) vs CIA (260M).
CIAGNWCIA / GNW
Capitalization190M3.73B5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-22.1539.413-235%
P/E Ratio17.0919.3788%
Revenue260M7.07B4%
Total Cash37.4M8.51B0%
Total Debt30M1.51B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIA vs GNW: Fundamental Ratings
CIA
GNW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5566
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
10090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7734
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GNW's Valuation (52) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as CIA (57). This means that GNW’s stock grew similarly to CIA’s over the last 12 months.

GNW's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIA (100). This means that GNW’s stock grew significantly faster than CIA’s over the last 12 months.

GNW's SMR Rating (90) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as CIA (100). This means that GNW’s stock grew similarly to CIA’s over the last 12 months.

GNW's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIA (85). This means that GNW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIA’s over the last 12 months.

GNW's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIA (77). This means that GNW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIAGNW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GNW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFIS37.540.26
+0.71%
Dimensional International Small Cap ETF
USSG72.060.49
+0.69%
Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Eq ETF
FLSA32.960.19
+0.57%
Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF
BAMY27.610.03
+0.09%
Brookstone Yield ETF
NNY8.15-0.02
-0.24%
Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund

CIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIA has been loosely correlated with SNFCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIA jumps, then SNFCA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIA
1D Price
Change %
CIA100%
-1.05%
SNFCA - CIA
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
PRU - CIA
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
MET - CIA
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
GNW - CIA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
LNC - CIA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More

GNW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNW has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GNW jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNW
1D Price
Change %
GNW100%
+0.20%
CNO - GNW
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
MET - GNW
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
LNC - GNW
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
GL - GNW
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
JXN - GNW
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
More