Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FFALX
CIBCX vs FFALX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FFALX
CIBCX vs FFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FFALX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Buy and FFALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. FFALX (2.96B). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FFALX: CIBCX (2.02) vs FFALX (1.59). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FFALX: CIBCX (25 years) vs FFALX (23 years). CIBCX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FFALX (1.02). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFALX (33.16). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFALX: CIBCX (250) vs FFALX (1000). FFALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.57 vs. CIBCX (9.63). FFALX return over 5 years is better than : 36.95 vs. CIBCX (33.43).
| CIBCX | FFALX | CIBCX / FFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.00 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.02 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.027 | 7.414 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 2.96B | 4,330% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 1.59 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.63 | 13.57 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.35 | 41.21 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.43 | 36.95 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.73 | 67.87 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement