Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FFALX
CIBCX vs FFALX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FFALX
CIBCX vs FFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FFALX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Hold and FFALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. FFALX (2.96B). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FFALX: CIBCX (2.02) vs FFALX (0.75). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FFALX: CIBCX (25 years) vs FFALX (23 years). CIBCX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FFALX (1.02). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFALX (33.16). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFALX: CIBCX (250) vs FFALX (1000). FFALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.16 vs. CIBCX (11.08). FFALX return over 5 years is better than : 38.84 vs. CIBCX (32.55).
| CIBCX | FFALX | CIBCX / FFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.00 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.02 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.905 | 7.179 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 2.96B | 4,329% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.75 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.08 | 16.16 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.30 | 43.68 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.55 | 38.84 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.15 | 75.55 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement