Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FFALX
CIBCX vs FFALX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FFALX
CIBCX vs FFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FFALX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Hold and FFALX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. FFALX (2.97B). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FFALX: CIBCX (1.97) vs FFALX (1.60). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FFALX: CIBCX (25 years) vs FFALX (23 years). CIBCX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FFALX (1.02). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFALX (33.16). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFALX: CIBCX (250) vs FFALX (1000). FFALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.64 vs. CIBCX (11.04). FFALX (39.38) and CIBCX (37.51) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CIBCX | FFALX | CIBCX / FFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.00 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.02 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.003 | 8.940 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 2.97B | 4,383% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 1.60 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.04 | 12.64 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.90 | 47.38 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.51 | 39.38 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.86 | 66.71 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers