Ad is loading...
CILGX vs RMEBX
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMEBX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$14.93
Change+$0.23 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.07M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. CILGX (175M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMEBX (1.21) vs CILGX (0.91). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CILGX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CILGX (0.79). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CILGX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMEBX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. CILGX (-0.37). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. CILGX (48.85).
| CILGX | RMEBX | CILGX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.916 | 1.203 | -409% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.21 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.37 | 5.19 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.81 | 16.77 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.85 | 55.02 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.89 | - |