Ad is loading...
CILGX vs RMEBX
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMEBX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$15.38
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.72M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.08
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. CILGX (177M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMEBX (1.54) vs CILGX (0.74). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CILGX (9 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CILGX (12.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMEBX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. CILGX (7.63). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. CILGX (25.07).
| CILGX | RMEBX | CILGX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.517 | 2.149 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.54 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.63 | 12.29 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.34 | 12.11 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.07 | 36.84 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.72 | - |