Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CILGX vs RMEBX
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMEBX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$16.13
Change+$0.38 (+2.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets181.96M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.84
Change+$0.57 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.68B
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. CILGX (182M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMEBX (1.11) vs CILGX (0.87). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CILGX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CILGX (0.79). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CILGX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMEBX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. CILGX (3.95). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 56.04 vs. CILGX (38.75).
| CILGX | RMEBX | CILGX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.876 | 11.417 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 182M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.11 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.95 | 7.77 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.51 | 26.51 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.75 | 56.04 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers