Ad is loading...
CILGX vs RMEBX
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMEBX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$14.33
Change+$0.07 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets170.41M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$52.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. CILGX (170M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMEBX (1.18) vs CILGX (0.89). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CILGX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CILGX (0.79). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CILGX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMEBX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.48 vs. CILGX (-2.04). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.73 vs. CILGX (45.39).
| CILGX | RMEBX | CILGX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.762 | -3.381 | 230% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 96.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.18 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.04 | 3.48 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.80 | 5.34 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.39 | 47.73 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.61 | - |