Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CILGX vs RMEBX
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMEBX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$15.91
Change-$0.10 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.77M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.57
Change+$0.07 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.76B
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. CILGX (184M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMEBX (1.09) vs CILGX (0.85). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CILGX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CILGX (0.79). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CILGX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMEBX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.12 vs. CILGX (5.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 56.85 vs. CILGX (34.20).
| CILGX | RMEBX | CILGX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.558 | 12.626 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 184M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.09 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.11 | 7.12 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.76 | 33.32 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.20 | 56.85 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement