Ad is loading...
CILGX vs RMEBX
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMEBX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$14.93
Change-$0.21 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.75M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.50
Change-$0.57 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.33B
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMEBX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. CILGX (178M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMEBX (1.15) vs CILGX (0.88). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CILGX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CILGX (0.79). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CILGX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMEBX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.82 vs. CILGX (2.38). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 62.77 vs. CILGX (57.79).
| CILGX | RMEBX | CILGX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.582 | 2.131 | -27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 178M | 102B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.15 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.38 | 6.82 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.26 | 16.31 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.79 | 62.77 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.08 | - |