Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs LSWWX
CIMAX vs LSWWX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs LSWWX
CIMAX vs LSWWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. LSWWX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and LSWWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. LSWWX (2.8B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than LSWWX: CIMAX (3.40) vs LSWWX (1.15). CIMAX was incepted earlier than LSWWX: CIMAX (24 years) vs LSWWX (30 years). LSWWX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. LSWWX (35.00). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSWWX: CIMAX (250) vs LSWWX (100000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. LSWWX (7.65). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.22 vs. LSWWX (-4.22).
| CIMAX | LSWWX | CIMAX / LSWWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.90 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.91 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.325 | 7.351 | 113% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 2.8B | 5,188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 1.15 | 295% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.12 | 7.65 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.88 | 23.16 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.22 | -4.22 | -669% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.36 | 53.53 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers