CINGF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.1M
FRGT
Price
$1.36
Change
-$0.03 (-2.16%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.05M
Ad is loading...

CINGF vs FRGT

Header iconCINGF vs FRGT Comparison
Open Charts CINGF vs FRGTBanner chart's image
Coinsilium Group
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$48.42K
Capitalization2.1M
Freight Technologies
Price$1.36
Change-$0.03 (-2.16%)
Volume$51.12K
Capitalization3.05M
CINGF vs FRGT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CINGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CINGF vs. FRGT commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINGF is a Hold and FRGT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CINGF: $0.05 vs. FRGT: $1.36)
Brand notoriety: CINGF and FRGT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINGF: 45% vs. FRGT: 28%
Market capitalization -- CINGF: $2.1M vs. FRGT: $3.05M
CINGF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.1M. FRGT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRGT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CINGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRGT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CINGF is a better buy in the long-term than FRGT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CINGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRGT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CINGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRGT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CINGF is a better buy in the short-term than FRGT.

Price Growth

CINGF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.31% price change this week, while FRGT (@Packaged Software) price change was -18.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRGT is expected to report earnings on May 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRGT($3.05M) has a higher market cap than CINGF($2.1M). CINGF YTD gains are higher at: -3.545 vs. FRGT (-28.042). CINGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 318K vs. FRGT (-7.91M). FRGT has more cash in the bank: 3.15M vs. CINGF (173K). FRGT has higher revenues than CINGF: FRGT (24.6M) vs CINGF (214K).
CINGFFRGTCINGF / FRGT
Capitalization2.1M3.05M69%
EBITDA318K-7.91M-4%
Gain YTD-3.545-28.04213%
P/E Ratio175.44N/A-
Revenue214K24.6M1%
Total Cash173K3.15M5%
Total DebtN/A4.49M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINGF vs FRGT: Fundamental Ratings
CINGF
FRGT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5055
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
66100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3595
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRGT's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CINGF (83). This means that FRGT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CINGF’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as FRGT (100). This means that CINGF’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRGT (100). This means that CINGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRGT (95). This means that CINGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRGT (100). This means that CINGF’s stock grew significantly faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CINGFFRGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CINGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITP0.430.02
+5.16%
IT Tech Packaging
HLLY3.120.05
+1.63%
Holley
TTC83.400.89
+1.08%
Toro Company (The)
ARRY7.15-0.01
-0.14%
Array Technologies
FORA2.03-0.06
-3.00%
Forian

CINGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CINGF and VENZF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CINGF and VENZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINGF
1D Price
Change %
CINGF100%
-12.74%
VENZF - CINGF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRGT - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
FOXO - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-26.98%
SWONF - CINGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCOEF - CINGF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FRGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRGT and GXAI have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRGT and GXAI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRGT
1D Price
Change %
FRGT100%
-2.16%
GXAI - FRGT
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
SDGR - FRGT
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
IMMR - FRGT
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
BHAT - FRGT
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.73%
XROLF - FRGT
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More