CIVB
Price
$26.95
Change
+$0.38 (+1.43%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
555.41M
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HAFC
Price
$31.66
Change
+$0.45 (+1.44%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
936.92M
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIVB vs HAFC

CIVB vs HAFC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIVB vs. HAFC commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIVB is a Hold and HAFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIVB vs HAFC: Fundamental Ratings
CIVB
HAFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8986
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5630
SMR RATING
1..100
3525
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2046
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAFC's Valuation (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIVB (31). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to CIVB’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIVB (56). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to CIVB’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIVB (35). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to CIVB’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIVB (45). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to CIVB’s over the last 12 months.

CIVB's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (46). This means that CIVB’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIVBHAFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CIVB: $26.57 vs. HAFC: $31.21)
Brand notoriety: CIVB and HAFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIVB: 52% vs. HAFC: 99%
Market capitalization -- CIVB: $555.41M vs. HAFC: $936.92M
CIVB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $555.41M. HAFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $936.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIVB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while HAFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CIVB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HAFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAFC is a better buy in the long-term than CIVB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIVB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIVB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HAFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIVB is a better buy in the short-term than HAFC.

Price Growth

CIVB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.81% price change this week, while HAFC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIVB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

HAFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.68% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CIVB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FVN9.700.31
+3.30%
Future Vision II Acquisition Corp.
BBIO66.911.11
+1.69%
BridgeBio Pharma
QUAD9.290.06
+0.65%
QUAD/GRAPHICS
AAP38.74-0.17
-0.44%
Advance Auto Parts
IMCC2.17-0.08
-3.56%
IM Cannabis Corp

CIVB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIVB has been closely correlated with CCNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIVB jumps, then CCNE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIVB
1D Price
Change %
CIVB100%
+0.72%
CCNE - CIVB
79%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
IBCP - CIVB
79%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
BY - CIVB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
FBIZ - CIVB
78%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
EFSC - CIVB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
More

HAFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFC has been closely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFC jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFC
1D Price
Change %
HAFC100%
+1.00%
HOPE - HAFC
74%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
BY - HAFC
72%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
ORRF - HAFC
71%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
IBCP - HAFC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
CIVB - HAFC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
More