CIVB
Price
$29.06
Change
+$0.16 (+0.55%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
604.28M
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HAFC
Price
$31.88
Change
+$0.19 (+0.60%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
945.25M
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIVB vs HAFC

CIVB vs HAFC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIVB vs. HAFC commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIVB is a Buy and HAFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CIVB: $29.06 vs. HAFC: $31.88)
Brand notoriety: CIVB and HAFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIVB: 51% vs. HAFC: 78%
Market capitalization -- CIVB: $604.28M vs. HAFC: $945.25M
CIVB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $604.28M. HAFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $945.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIVB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHAFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CIVB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HAFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CIVB and HAFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIVB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAFC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIVB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HAFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIVB is a better buy in the short-term than HAFC.

Price Growth

CIVB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.68% price change this week, while HAFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIVB is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.

HAFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAFC($945M) has a higher market cap than CIVB($604M). CIVB (10.84) and HAFC (10.73) have similar P/E ratio . CIVB YTD gains are higher at: 32.706 vs. HAFC (20.247). HAFC has less debt than CIVB: HAFC (131M) vs CIVB (209M). HAFC has higher revenues than CIVB: HAFC (279M) vs CIVB (176M).
CIVBHAFCCIVB / HAFC
Capitalization604M945M64%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.70620.247162%
P/E Ratio10.8410.73101%
Revenue176M279M63%
Total CashN/A78.8M-
Total Debt209M131M160%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIVB vs HAFC: Fundamental Ratings
CIVB
HAFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4631
SMR RATING
1..100
5952
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2048
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAFC's Valuation (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIVB (34). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to CIVB’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIVB (46). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to CIVB’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's SMR Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIVB (59). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to CIVB’s over the last 12 months.

CIVB's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (44). This means that CIVB’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

CIVB's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (48). This means that CIVB’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIVBHAFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIVB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACGMX25.020.26
+1.05%
Invesco Growth and Income Y
ELGAX5.910.06
+1.03%
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth A
CMLCX64.220.02
+0.03%
American Funds American Mutual 529-C
GSATX42.24-0.10
-0.24%
Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts A
VYMYX18.92-0.05
-0.26%
Voya MI Dynamic SMID Cap W

CIVB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIVB has been closely correlated with FBIZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIVB jumps, then FBIZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIVB
1D Price
Change %
CIVB100%
+0.55%
FBIZ - CIVB
79%
Closely correlated
+4.39%
IBCP - CIVB
79%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
MBWM - CIVB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
CCNE - CIVB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
EFSC - CIVB
77%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
More