HAFC
Price
$31.66
Change
+$0.45 (+1.44%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
936.92M
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IBCP
Price
$36.37
Change
+$0.80 (+2.25%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
790.07M
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAFC vs IBCP

HAFC vs IBCP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAFC vs. IBCP commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAFC is a StrongBuy and IBCP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAFC vs IBCP: Fundamental Ratings
HAFC
IBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8690
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3024
SMR RATING
1..100
2528
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4636
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAFC's Valuation (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IBCP (32). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to IBCP’s over the last 12 months.

IBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (30). This means that IBCP’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IBCP (28). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to IBCP’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IBCP (49). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to IBCP’s over the last 12 months.

IBCP's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (46). This means that IBCP’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HAFCIBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (HAFC: $31.21 vs. IBCP: $35.57)
Brand notoriety: HAFC and IBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAFC: 99% vs. IBCP: 107%
Market capitalization -- HAFC: $936.92M vs. IBCP: $790.07M
HAFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $936.92M. IBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $790.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while IBCP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HAFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IBCP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HAFC and IBCP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBCP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IBCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAFC is a better buy in the short-term than IBCP.

Price Growth

HAFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.95% price change this week, while IBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

IBCP is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.68% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
HAFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OABI4.990.03
+0.60%
OmniAb
UFI6.52-0.01
-0.15%
UNIFI
FSM11.17-0.07
-0.62%
Fortuna Mining Corp
SW43.04-1.06
-2.40%
Smurfit WestRock plc
OBAI0.21-0.05
-20.54%
Our Bond Inc.

HAFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFC has been closely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFC jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFC
1D Price
Change %
HAFC100%
+1.00%
HOPE - HAFC
74%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
BY - HAFC
72%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
ORRF - HAFC
71%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
IBCP - HAFC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
CIVB - HAFC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
More

IBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBCP has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBCP jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBCP
1D Price
Change %
IBCP100%
+0.94%
FMBH - IBCP
85%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
BY - IBCP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
MBWM - IBCP
84%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
CCNE - IBCP
84%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
SRCE - IBCP
84%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
More