Advertisement
CL vs KMB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Kimberly-Clark (KMB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CL has delivered stronger year-to-date (YTD) returns of 11.8% compared to KMB's 2.0%, reflecting better recent momentum.
- Both stocks reported Q1 2026 earnings beats in recent weeks, with CL achieving 8.4% revenue growth and KMB posting 3% organic sales growth.
- KMB offers a higher dividend yield at 5.24% versus CL's 2.43%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- CL trades at a higher price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 33.2 compared to KMB's 18.9, indicating premium valuation for growth.
- Low betas (0.33 for CL, 0.30 for KMB) highlight both as defensive plays in consumer staples amid market volatility.
Introduction
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) are leading consumer staples companies specializing in essential household and personal care products. This stock comparison examines their recent performance, business drivers, and market positioning in the current environment. Investors seeking stable, defensive holdings with reliable dividends, as well as traders eyeing relative momentum in a volatile market, will find value here. Both firms benefit from resilient demand for everyday goods, but differences in growth profiles and regional exposures offer trade-offs for portfolio allocation.
CL Overview and Recent Performance
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) is a global leader in oral care, personal care, home care, and pet nutrition products, with strong presence in emerging markets. In recent market activity, CL shares have shown upward momentum, trading around $87 with a market cap of $70 billion. The stock's YTD gain of 11.8% outperforms broader indices, supported by Q1 2026 results where earnings per share (EPS) of $0.97 beat estimates and revenue grew 8.4% to $5.32 billion, driven by robust volume in emerging markets despite cost pressures. Sentiment has improved on consistent organic growth and analyst targets averaging $95, though elevated P/E reflects growth expectations.
KMB Overview and Recent Performance
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) manufactures personal care, consumer tissue, and professional products like diapers, wipes, and paper towels, with a focus on North America. Shares trade near $98 with a $32 billion market cap. Recent performance has been steadier, with YTD returns at 2.0%, bolstered by Q1 2026 earnings where adjusted EPS of $1.97 exceeded forecasts and net sales rose to $4.16 billion on 3% organic growth from volumes and innovation. Factors like market share gains offset input cost rises from oil prices, maintaining positive outlook with reaffirmed full-year guidance and a compelling dividend yield.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351 bots trading thousands of tickers across diverse strategies and timeframes. These bots excel in current conditions, boasting annualized returns up to 163%, win rates from 51% to 88%, profit factors of 1.5 to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 17 in top cases, with average trade durations from minutes to weeks. Focused on high-momentum sectors like semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, AMD) and small caps, they provide real-time signals for copy trading via virtual, signal, or brokerage agents. Traders can review detailed stats to align bots with their risk tolerance and market views.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CL and KMB operate in consumer staples, offering recession-resistant models, but CL emphasizes global oral and personal care with emerging market growth (e.g., 13x volume expectations), while KMB leverages North American strength in tissues and hygiene via innovation and share gains. Recent momentum favors CL with superior YTD and post-earnings lifts, versus KMB's steady 1-year outperformance. Risk profiles align with low betas, though KMB faces higher commodity exposure (e.g., oil). KMB's lower P/E and higher yield suit value/income plays; CL's premium supports growth positioning. Market sentiment remains bullish on both post-earnings, with analyst targets implying 10-15% upside.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently favor CL over KMB, based on stronger trend consistency, YTD relative performance, and emerging market catalysts positioning it for continued outperformance in the near term. KMB remains attractive probabilistically for dividend stability amid volatility.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CL is a Hold and KMB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKMB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- KMB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.66% price change this week, while KMB (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.91%.
Reported Earning Dates
CL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
KMB is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-1.57% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| CL | KMB | CL / KMB | |
| Capitalization | 70.5B | 31.8B | 222% |
| EBITDA | 3.9B | 3.21B | 121% |
| Gain YTD | 12.909 | -3.762 | -343% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.16 | 18.55 | 184% |
| Revenue | 20.8B | 16.6B | 125% |
| Total Cash | 1.34B | 542M | 246% |
| Total Debt | 7.97B | 7.08B | 113% |
CL | KMB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KMB's Valuation (14) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98). This means that KMB’s stock grew significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (100). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (6) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (11). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.
CL's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (61). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (49). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | KMB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 35% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 43% | 12 days ago 42% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 36% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| COTG | 16.29 | 0.26 | +1.60% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | |||
| STOT | 46.93 | -0.06 | -0.13% |
| State Street®DoubleLine®ShrtDurTRTactETF | |||
| BSJW | 25.24 | -0.11 | -0.42% |
| Invesco BulltShr 2032 Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF | |||
| SLYG | 105.79 | -1.98 | -1.84% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Sm Cp GrETF | |||
| FLMX | 37.70 | -0.81 | -2.10% |
| Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF | |||
CL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.
KMB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been loosely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then CL could also see price increases.