Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs PABYX
CLBAX vs PABYX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs PABYX
CLBAX vs PABYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. PABYX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and PABYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. PABYX (3.16B). PABYX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: PABYX (2.79) vs CLBAX (1.78). CLBAX was incepted earlier than PABYX: CLBAX (24 years) vs PABYX (32 years). PABYX (0.65) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: PABYX (0) vs CLBAX (250). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.88 vs. PABYX (13.47). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.87 vs. PABYX (11.78).
| CLBAX | PABYX | CLBAX / PABYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.65 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.65 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.269 | 7.216 | 115% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 3.16B | 9,102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 2.79 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.88 | 13.47 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.83 | 35.61 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.87 | 11.78 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.97 | 62.61 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement