Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs PABYX
CLBAX vs PABYX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs PABYX
CLBAX vs PABYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. PABYX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and PABYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. PABYX (3.16B). PABYX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: PABYX (2.79) vs CLBAX (1.78). CLBAX was incepted earlier than PABYX: CLBAX (24 years) vs PABYX (32 years). PABYX (0.65) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: PABYX (0) vs CLBAX (250). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.74 vs. PABYX (14.58). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.18 vs. PABYX (13.43).
| CLBAX | PABYX | CLBAX / PABYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.65 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.65 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.696 | 7.216 | 134% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 3.16B | 8,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 2.79 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.74 | 14.58 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 36.91 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.18 | 13.43 | 277% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.87 | 58.83 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement