Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs PWTAX
CLBAX vs PWTAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs PWTAX
CLBAX vs PWTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. PWTAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and PWTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. PWTAX (229M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than PWTAX: CLBAX (1.82) vs PWTAX (1.14). CLBAX was incepted earlier than PWTAX: CLBAX (25 years) vs PWTAX (33 years). PWTAX (1.03) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). PWTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). PWTAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CLBAX (4%) vs CLBAX (4%). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PWTAX: CLBAX (250) vs PWTAX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.63 vs. PWTAX (7.83). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.82 vs. PWTAX (-2.37).
| CLBAX | PWTAX | CLBAX / PWTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.03 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.03 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.098 | 9.186 | 110% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 229M | 123,581% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.14 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.63 | 7.83 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.00 | 31.33 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.82 | -2.37 | -1,509% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.05 | 39.41 | 239% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers