Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FSNIX
CLBFX vs FSNIX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FSNIX
CLBFX vs FSNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FSNIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FSNIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSNIX (5.61B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than FSNIX: CLBFX (1.92) vs FSNIX (1.78). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FSNIX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FSNIX (19 years). FSNIX (0.70) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSNIX (29.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: FSNIX (0) vs CLBFX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.46 vs. CLBFX (16.85). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.93 vs. FSNIX (29.94).
| CLBFX | FSNIX | CLBFX / FSNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.67 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.70 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.449 | 10.428 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.61B | 5,136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.78 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.85 | 18.46 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | 43.26 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.93 | 29.94 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.85 | 99.97 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement