CLFD
Price
$32.64
Change
-$0.46 (-1.39%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
450.35M
69 days until earnings call
CMBM
Price
$0.76
Change
-$0.03 (-3.80%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
22.23M
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLFD vs CMBM

Header iconCLFD vs CMBM Comparison
Open Charts CLFD vs CMBMBanner chart's image
Clearfield
Price$32.64
Change-$0.46 (-1.39%)
Volume$3.28K
Capitalization450.35M
Cambium Networks
Price$0.76
Change-$0.03 (-3.80%)
Volume$7.79K
Capitalization22.23M
CLFD vs CMBM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMBM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLFD vs. CMBM commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLFD is a Buy and CMBM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CLFD: $33.10 vs. CMBM: $0.79)
Brand notoriety: CLFD and CMBM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLFD: 44% vs. CMBM: 17%
Market capitalization -- CLFD: $456.98M vs. CMBM: $22.23M
CLFD [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $456.98M. CMBM’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $22.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $274.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLFD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCMBM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CMBM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMBM is a better buy in the long-term than CLFD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLFD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMBM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLFD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CMBM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLFD is a better buy in the short-term than CMBM.

Price Growth

CLFD (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +5.97% price change this week, while CMBM (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +15.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +4.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLFD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

CMBM is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+4.02% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLFD($450M) has a higher market cap than CMBM($22.2M). CMBM YTD gains are higher at: 22.038 vs. CLFD (6.774). CLFD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.21M vs. CMBM (-72.59M). CLFD has more cash in the bank: 117M vs. CMBM (46.5M). CLFD has less debt than CMBM: CLFD (21.7M) vs CMBM (76.9M). CLFD (179M) and CMBM (172M) have equivalent revenues.
CLFDCMBMCLFD / CMBM
Capitalization450M22.2M2,027%
EBITDA9.21M-72.59M-13%
Gain YTD6.77422.03831%
P/E Ratio3262.00N/A-
Revenue179M172M104%
Total Cash117M46.5M252%
Total Debt21.7M76.9M28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLFD vs CMBM: Fundamental Ratings
CLFD
CMBM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5557
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMBM's Valuation (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLFD (98) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that CMBM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CMBM (100) in the null industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to CMBM’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's SMR Rating (100) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CMBM (100) in the null industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to CMBM’s over the last 12 months.

CMBM's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CLFD (65) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that CMBM’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

CMBM's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLFD (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that CMBM’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFDCMBM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMBM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDGCX28.060.11
+0.39%
BlackRock Advantage Global Investor A
SVAYX28.40N/A
N/A
SEI Large Cap Value Y (SIMT)
GIDCX7.98N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Div & Prem C
HQIYX22.25N/A
N/A
Hartford Equity Income Y
LAVGX16.36N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Growth R6

CLFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLFD has been loosely correlated with EXTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLFD jumps, then EXTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLFD
1D Price
Change %
CLFD100%
+1.13%
EXTR - CLFD
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.65%
DGII - CLFD
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
BDC - CLFD
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
ZBRA - CLFD
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
KN - CLFD
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
More

CMBM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMBM and SYNX have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMBM and SYNX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBM
1D Price
Change %
CMBM100%
+0.83%
SYNX - CMBM
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
AIRG - CMBM
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.15%
AIOT - CMBM
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.92%
CLFD - CMBM
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
CMTL - CMBM
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
More