CLFD
Price
$27.54
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
374.1M
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SILC
Price
$43.94
Change
+$2.54 (+6.14%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
252.55M
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLFD vs SILC

CLFD vs SILC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLFD vs. SILC commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLFD is a Hold and SILC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CLFD: $27.54 vs. SILC: $43.94)
Brand notoriety: CLFD and SILC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLFD: 47% vs. SILC: 79%
Market capitalization -- CLFD: $374.1M vs. SILC: $252.55M
CLFD [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $374.1M. SILC’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $252.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $437.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $20.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLFD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSILC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SILC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SILC is a better buy in the long-term than CLFD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLFD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SILC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLFD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SILC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLFD is a better buy in the short-term than SILC.

Price Growth

CLFD (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -4.34% price change this week, while SILC (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -11.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -6.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLFD is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

SILC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-6.52% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLFD($374M) has a higher market cap than SILC($253M). SILC YTD gains are higher at: 198.912 vs. CLFD (-5.523). CLFD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.4M vs. SILC (-10.69M). CLFD has more cash in the bank: 91.1M vs. SILC (31.3M). SILC has less debt than CLFD: SILC (6.44M) vs CLFD (10.9M). CLFD has higher revenues than SILC: CLFD (149M) vs SILC (75.4M).
CLFDSILCCLFD / SILC
Capitalization374M253M148%
EBITDA11.4M-10.69M-107%
Gain YTD-5.523198.912-3%
P/E Ratio94.90N/A-
Revenue149M75.4M198%
Total Cash91.1M31.3M291%
Total Debt10.9M6.44M169%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLFD vs SILC: Fundamental Ratings
CLFD
SILC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10097
SMR RATING
1..100
9193
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7936
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SILC's Valuation (49) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CLFD (67) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

SILC's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CLFD (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's SMR Rating (91) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SILC (93) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to SILC’s over the last 12 months.

SILC's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLFD (79) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

SILC's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CLFD (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFDSILC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLFD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SILC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAAKX25.310.13
+0.52%
MoA All America Fund
MLRRX10.800.04
+0.37%
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Class R1
VYRIX8.57N/A
N/A
VY® T. Rowe Price Divers Mid Cap Gr R6
FHOFX30.66N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series Large Cp Grwth Idx
VICAX23.60-0.07
-0.30%
USA Mutuals Vice A

CLFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLFD has been loosely correlated with HLIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLFD jumps, then HLIT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLFD
1D Price
Change %
CLFD100%
N/A
HLIT - CLFD
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
KN - CLFD
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
INSG - CLFD
41%
Loosely correlated
+9.20%
ADTN - CLFD
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
ITRN - CLFD
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
More

SILC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILC has been loosely correlated with HLIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SILC jumps, then HLIT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SILC
1D Price
Change %
SILC100%
+6.14%
HLIT - SILC
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
VIAV - SILC
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
CRNT - SILC
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
OCC - SILC
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
CLFD - SILC
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More