CLH
Price
$243.68
Change
-$1.93 (-0.79%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
13.07B
61 days until earnings call
LNZA
Price
$21.46
Change
-$0.78 (-3.51%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
49.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLH vs LNZA

Header iconCLH vs LNZA Comparison
Open Charts CLH vs LNZABanner chart's image
Clean Harbors
Price$243.68
Change-$1.93 (-0.79%)
Volume$236.68K
Capitalization13.07B
LanzaTech Global
Price$21.46
Change-$0.78 (-3.51%)
Volume$11.25K
Capitalization49.8M
CLH vs LNZA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLH vs. LNZA commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLH is a StrongBuy and LNZA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CLH: $243.68 vs. LNZA: $21.47)
Brand notoriety: CLH and LNZA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLH: 63% vs. LNZA: 43%
Market capitalization -- CLH: $13.07B vs. LNZA: $49.8M
CLH [@Environmental Services] is valued at $13.07B. LNZA’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $49.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $90.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLNZA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LNZA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the long-term than LNZA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNZA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LNZA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the short-term than LNZA.

Price Growth

CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while LNZA (@Environmental Services) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-2.17% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLH($13.1B) has a higher market cap than LNZA($49.8M). CLH YTD gains are higher at: 5.883 vs. LNZA (-84.332). CLH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.11B vs. LNZA (-108.99M). CLH has more cash in the bank: 699M vs. LNZA (6.67K). LNZA has less debt than CLH: LNZA (64.7M) vs CLH (3.03B). CLH has higher revenues than LNZA: CLH (5.94B) vs LNZA (48.8M).
CLHLNZACLH / LNZA
Capitalization13.1B49.8M26,305%
EBITDA1.11B-108.99M-1,014%
Gain YTD5.883-84.332-7%
P/E Ratio34.27N/A-
Revenue5.94B48.8M12,176%
Total Cash699M6.67K10,478,189%
Total Debt3.03B64.7M4,688%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLH: Fundamental Ratings
CLH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLHLNZA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCTT41.730.09
+0.20%
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF
EAFG21.800.04
+0.19%
Pacer Developed Mkts Csh Cow Gr Ldr ETF
BSCY20.840.02
+0.12%
Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corp Bd ETF
NUW13.70N/A
N/A
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund
RWO45.50-0.09
-0.20%
SPDR® Dow Jones® Global Real Estate ETF

CLH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLH
1D Price
Change %
CLH100%
-0.79%
NVRI - CLH
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
CWST - CLH
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
WCN - CLH
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
GFL - CLH
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
PESI - CLH
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
More

LNZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNZA has been loosely correlated with HAIUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNZA jumps, then HAIUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNZA
1D Price
Change %
LNZA100%
-3.55%
HAIUF - LNZA
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ABAT - LNZA
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.82%
MLAC - LNZA
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLH - LNZA
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
QRHC - LNZA
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.75%
More