CLH
Price
$236.25
Change
-$8.88 (-3.62%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.67B
53 days until earnings call
MEG
Price
$30.41
Change
+$1.09 (+3.72%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.07B
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLH vs MEG

Header iconCLH vs MEG Comparison
Open Charts CLH vs MEGBanner chart's image
Clean Harbors
Price$236.25
Change-$8.88 (-3.62%)
Volume$869.92K
Capitalization12.67B
Montrose Environmental Group
Price$30.41
Change+$1.09 (+3.72%)
Volume$378.94K
Capitalization1.07B
CLH vs MEG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLH vs. MEG commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLH is a StrongBuy and MEG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CLH: $236.25 vs. MEG: $30.41)
Brand notoriety: CLH and MEG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLH: 233% vs. MEG: 89%
Market capitalization -- CLH: $12.67B vs. MEG: $1.07B
CLH [@Environmental Services] is valued at $12.67B. MEG’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $1.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $88.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMEG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MEG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the long-term than MEG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MEG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MEG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the short-term than MEG.

Price Growth

CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а -2.46% price change this week, while MEG (@Environmental Services) price change was -2.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

MEG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.77% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLH($12.7B) has a higher market cap than MEG($1.07B). MEG YTD gains are higher at: 63.935 vs. CLH (2.655). CLH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.11B vs. MEG (53.6M). CLH has more cash in the bank: 699M vs. MEG (10.5M). MEG has less debt than CLH: MEG (331M) vs CLH (3.03B). CLH has higher revenues than MEG: CLH (5.94B) vs MEG (780M).
CLHMEGCLH / MEG
Capitalization12.7B1.07B1,184%
EBITDA1.11B53.6M2,062%
Gain YTD2.65563.9354%
P/E Ratio33.23N/A-
Revenue5.94B780M762%
Total Cash699M10.5M6,657%
Total Debt3.03B331M916%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLH vs MEG: Fundamental Ratings
CLH
MEG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6617
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2089
SMR RATING
1..100
5394
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4073

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MEG's Valuation (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLH (81) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that MEG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLH’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MEG (89) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew significantly faster than MEG’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's SMR Rating (53) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MEG (94) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MEG’s over the last 12 months.

MEG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CLH (50) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that MEG’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MEG (100) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MEG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLHMEG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMTB44.180.24
+0.54%
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
IBTI22.410.05
+0.22%
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF
CZAR32.21N/A
N/A
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
RSMR21.45N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March
PGRO42.75-0.05
-0.12%
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF

CLH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLH
1D Price
Change %
CLH100%
-3.62%
NVRI - CLH
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
CWST - CLH
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
WM - CLH
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
WCN - CLH
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
GFL - CLH
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
More