Advertisement
CLH vs RSG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLH is a StrongBuy and RSG is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RSG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RSG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а +4.85% price change this week, while RSG (@Environmental Services) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLH is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
RSG is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Environmental Services (+2.67% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| CLH | RSG | CLH / RSG | |
| Capitalization | 12.2B | 67.2B | 18% |
| EBITDA | 1.13B | 5.04B | 22% |
| Gain YTD | -1.121 | 9.021 | -12% |
| P/E Ratio | 31.61 | 32.25 | 98% |
| Revenue | 5.96B | 16.5B | 36% |
| Total Cash | 850M | 84M | 1,012% |
| Total Debt | 3.03B | 13.5B | 22% |
CLH | RSG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLH's Valuation (76) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as RSG (83). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to RSG’s over the last 12 months.
RSG's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CLH (20). This means that RSG’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.
RSG's SMR Rating (47) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CLH (53). This means that RSG’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.
RSG's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CLH (61). This means that RSG’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as RSG (50). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to RSG’s over the last 12 months.
| CLH | RSG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 33% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 34% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 48% | 24 days ago 34% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 23% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 47% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SGDM | 68.11 | 1.26 | +1.88% |
| Sprott Gold Miners ETF | |||
| IGF | 63.06 | 0.33 | +0.53% |
| iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | |||
| MGMT | 43.55 | 0.12 | +0.28% |
| Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF | |||
| LJUL | 23.94 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| Innovator Premium Income 15 Buf ETF -Jul | |||
| DEEP | 35.59 | -0.12 | -0.33% |
| Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF | |||
CLH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLH | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| NVRI - CLH | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| WCN - CLH | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| WM - CLH | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| GFL - CLH | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CWST - CLH | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||