CLH
Price
$217.48
Change
+$3.54 (+1.65%)
Updated
May 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.63B
90 days until earnings call
RSG
Price
$249.69
Change
-$1.06 (-0.42%)
Updated
May 1, 03:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
60.23B
84 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLH vs RSG

Header iconCLH vs RSG Comparison
Open Charts CLH vs RSGBanner chart's image
Clean Harbors
Price$217.48
Change+$3.54 (+1.65%)
Volume$9.08K
Capitalization10.63B
Republic Services
Price$249.69
Change-$1.06 (-0.42%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization60.23B
CLH vs RSG Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLH vs. RSG commentary
May 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLH is a Buy and RSG is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CLH: $213.94 vs. RSG: $250.75)
Brand notoriety: CLH and RSG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLH: 170% vs. RSG: 119%
Market capitalization -- CLH: $10.63B vs. RSG: $60.23B
CLH [@Environmental Services] is valued at $10.63B. RSG’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $60.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RSG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSG is a better buy in the long-term than CLH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLH’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLH’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RSG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the short-term than RSG.

Price Growth

CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а +2.09% price change this week, while RSG (@Environmental Services) price change was +3.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

RSG is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+2.25% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSG($60.2B) has a higher market cap than CLH($10.6B). RSG has higher P/E ratio than CLH: RSG (34.70) vs CLH (28.35). RSG YTD gains are higher at: 25.298 vs. CLH (-7.039). RSG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.3B vs. CLH (990M). CLH has less debt than RSG: CLH (2.49B) vs RSG (13.1B). RSG has higher revenues than CLH: RSG (15B) vs CLH (5.41B).
CLHRSGCLH / RSG
Capitalization10.6B60.2B18%
EBITDA990M4.3B23%
Gain YTD-7.03925.298-28%
P/E Ratio28.3534.7082%
Revenue5.41B15B36%
Total Cash551MN/A-
Total Debt2.49B13.1B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLH vs RSG: Fundamental Ratings
CLH
RSG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1376
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
161
SMR RATING
1..100
5248
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
519
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4442
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLH's Valuation (75) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as RSG (88). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to RSG’s over the last 12 months.

RSG's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CLH (16). This means that RSG’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.

RSG's SMR Rating (48) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CLH (52). This means that RSG’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.

RSG's Price Growth Rating (9) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLH (51). This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLH’s over the last 12 months.

RSG's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CLH (44). This means that RSG’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLHRSG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZSL31.990.69
+2.20%
ProShares UltraShort Silver
PDX21.990.39
+1.81%
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund
VOT248.900.31
+0.12%
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
FOF11.73N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Closed End Opportunity Fund
IYLD20.26-0.02
-0.10%
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Inc ETF

CLH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLH
1D Price
Change %
CLH100%
-0.07%
NVRI - CLH
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
WCN - CLH
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
CWST - CLH
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
GFL - CLH
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
QRHC - CLH
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More