CLH
Price
$231.63
Change
+$3.17 (+1.39%)
Updated
Jun 26, 01:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.63B
34 days until earnings call
SECYF
Price
$11.11
Change
+$0.20 (+1.83%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLH vs SECYF

Header iconCLH vs SECYF Comparison
Open Charts CLH vs SECYFBanner chart's image
Clean Harbors
Price$231.63
Change+$3.17 (+1.39%)
Volume$100
Capitalization10.63B
SECURE WASTE INFRASTRUCTURE
Price$11.11
Change+$0.20 (+1.83%)
Volume$28.6K
Capitalization1.53B
CLH vs SECYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLH vs. SECYF commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLH is a StrongBuy and SECYF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CLH: $228.45 vs. SECYF: $11.11)
Brand notoriety: CLH and SECYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLH: 84% vs. SECYF: 3%
Market capitalization -- CLH: $10.63B vs. SECYF: $1.53B
CLH [@Environmental Services] is valued at $10.63B. SECYF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $1.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSECYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SECYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SECYF is a better buy in the long-term than CLH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SECYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SECYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SECYF is a better buy in the short-term than CLH.

Price Growth

CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а +0.93% price change this week, while SECYF (@Environmental Services) price change was -2.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

SECYF is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-0.39% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLH($10.6B) has a higher market cap than SECYF($1.53B). CLH has higher P/E ratio than SECYF: CLH (28.35) vs SECYF (11.75). CLH YTD gains are higher at: -0.734 vs. SECYF (-1.551). CLH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 990M vs. SECYF (540M). CLH has more cash in the bank: 551M vs. SECYF (27M). SECYF has less debt than CLH: SECYF (1.09B) vs CLH (2.49B). SECYF has higher revenues than CLH: SECYF (7.86B) vs CLH (5.41B).
CLHSECYFCLH / SECYF
Capitalization10.6B1.53B695%
EBITDA990M540M183%
Gain YTD-0.734-1.55147%
P/E Ratio28.3511.75241%
Revenue5.41B7.86B69%
Total Cash551M27M2,041%
Total Debt2.49B1.09B228%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLH vs SECYF: Fundamental Ratings
CLH
SECYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7279
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
179
SMR RATING
1..100
5352
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
595
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SECYF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CLH (77) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that SECYF’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CLH (17) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that SECYF’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CLH (53) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that SECYF’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as SECYF (51) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to SECYF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLH (59) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that SECYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLHSECYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EVSYX25.24N/A
N/A
Allspring Disciplined US Core Admin
WICGX5.84N/A
N/A
William Blair China Growth I
GCLLX16.49N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity C
PARWX54.52N/A
N/A
Parnassus Value Equity Investor
WCEIX11.02N/A
N/A
Virtus Westchester Event-Driven Fd I

CLH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLH
1D Price
Change %
CLH100%
-1.81%
NVRI - CLH
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
WCN - CLH
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
CWST - CLH
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
GFL - CLH
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
PESI - CLH
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
More

SECYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SECYF and NVRI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SECYF and NVRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SECYF
1D Price
Change %
SECYF100%
+1.83%
NVRI - SECYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
CLH - SECYF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
TMRAF - SECYF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSKIF - SECYF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCEI - SECYF
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.19%
More