CLH vs SECYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLH is a Hold and SECYF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSECYF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SECYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CLH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а -5.12% price change this week, while SECYF (@Environmental Services) price change was -2.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLH is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Environmental Services (+0.15% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| CLH | SECYF | CLH / SECYF | |
| Capitalization | 10.6B | 1.53B | 695% |
| EBITDA | 990M | 540M | 183% |
| Gain YTD | -5.271 | -10.412 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.35 | 11.75 | 241% |
| Revenue | 5.41B | 7.86B | 69% |
| Total Cash | 551M | 27M | 2,041% |
| Total Debt | 2.49B | 1.09B | 228% |
CLH | SECYF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SECYF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLH (73) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that SECYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLH’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as SECYF (14) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to SECYF’s over the last 12 months.
SECYF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLH (51) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that SECYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLH’s over the last 12 months.
SECYF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as CLH (62) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that SECYF’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SECYF (97) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SECYF’s over the last 12 months.
| CLH | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GLL | 14.29 | 0.04 | +0.28% |
| ProShares UltraShort Gold | |||
| NUEM | 30.41 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF | |||
| SDOG | 59.18 | -0.26 | -0.44% |
| ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | |||
| MFEM | 19.31 | -0.10 | -0.52% |
| PIMCO RAFI Dyn Mlt-Fctr Emrg Mkts Eq ETF | |||
| IXUS | 70.52 | -0.47 | -0.66% |
| iShares Core MSCI Total Intl Stk ETF | |||
CLH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLH | 100% | +2.75% | ||
| WCN - CLH | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| CWST - CLH | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| NVRI - CLH | 40% Loosely correlated | -4.10% | ||
| LICY - CLH | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.01% | ||
| RSG - CLH | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.00% | ||
More | ||||
SECYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SECYF and NVRI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SECYF and NVRI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SECYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SECYF | 100% | -2.51% | ||
| NVRI - SECYF | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.10% | ||
| CLH - SECYF | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.75% | ||
| TMRAF - SECYF | 4% Poorly correlated | -4.57% | ||
| DSKIF - SECYF | 3% Poorly correlated | +13.26% | ||
| GCEI - SECYF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||