Advertisement
CLH vs TMRAY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLH is a StrongBuy and TMRAY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMRAY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TMRAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMRAY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TMRAY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а -2.53% price change this week, while TMRAY (@Environmental Services) price change was -0.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
TMRAY is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Environmental Services (+0.34% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| CLH | TMRAY | CLH / TMRAY | |
| Capitalization | 13B | 4.48B | 290% |
| EBITDA | 1.11B | 271M | 408% |
| Gain YTD | 5.245 | 22.882 | 23% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.07 | 37.46 | 91% |
| Revenue | 5.94B | 1.36B | 438% |
| Total Cash | 699M | 119M | 587% |
| Total Debt | 3.03B | 611M | 496% |
CLH | TMRAY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 8 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLH's Valuation (79) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as TMRAY (81) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to TMRAY’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for TMRAY (100) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew significantly faster than TMRAY’s over the last 12 months.
TMRAY's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CLH (53) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that TMRAY’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as TMRAY (53) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to TMRAY’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMRAY (95) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMRAY’s over the last 12 months.
| CLH | TMRAY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 42% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSPS | 30.52 | 0.22 | +0.73% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Eql Wt Cnsm Stapl ETF | |||
| XVOL | 22.66 | N/A | N/A |
| Acruence Active Hedge US Equity ETF | |||
| PQDI | 19.45 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
| Principal Spectrum Tax-Adv Dvd Actv ETF | |||
| ABOT | 39.04 | -0.15 | -0.37% |
| Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF | |||
| QQXT | 98.36 | -0.41 | -0.41% |
| First Trust NASDAQ-100 ex-Tech Sect ETF | |||
CLH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLH | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| NVRI - CLH | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| CWST - CLH | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| WCN - CLH | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| GFL - CLH | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| PESI - CLH | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||
TMRAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMRAY has been loosely correlated with TMRAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMRAY jumps, then TMRAF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMRAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMRAY | 100% | +0.67% | ||
| TMRAF - TMRAY | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CWST - TMRAY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| CLH - TMRAY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
| NVRI - TMRAY | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.08% | ||
| VEOEY - TMRAY | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||